Gamifying a situational judgment test with immersion and control game elements

Assessment gamification, which refers to the addition of game elements to existing assessments, is commonly implemented to improved applicant reactions to existing psychometric measures. This study aims to understand the effects of gamification on applicant reactions to and measurement quality of situational judgment tests.,In a 2 × 4 between-subjects experiment, this study randomly assigned 315 people to experience different versions of a gamified situational judgment test, crossing immersive game elements (text, audio, still pictures, video) with control game elements (high and low), measuring applicant reactions and assessing differences in convergent validity between conditions.,The use of immersive game elements improved perceptions of organizational technological sophistication, but no other reactions outcomes (test attitudes, procedural justice, organizational attractiveness). Convergent validity with cognitive ability was not affected by gamification.,This is the first study to experimentally examine applicant reactions and measurement quality to SJTs based upon the implementation of specific game elements. It demonstrates that small-scale efforts to gamify assessments are likely to lead to only small-scale gains. However, it also demonstrates that such modifications can be done without harming the measurement qualities of the test, making gamification a potentially useful marketing tool for assessment specialists. Thus, this study concludes that utility should be considered carefully and explicitly for any attempt to gamify assessment.

[1]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Situational judgment testing: a review and some new developments , 2015 .

[2]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[3]  Tara S. Behrend,et al.  Using Animated Agents in Learner‐Controlled Training: The Effects of Design Control , 2012 .

[4]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  An Inconvenient Truth: Arbitrary Distinctions Between Organizational, Mechanical Turk, and Other Convenience Samples , 2015, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[5]  James W. Smither,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES , 2006 .

[6]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Situational Judgment Tests: From Measures of Situational Judgment to Measures of General Domain Knowledge , 2015, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[7]  F. Lievens,et al.  Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: a comparison in terms of predictive validity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  Gamification Science, Its History and Future: Definitions and a Research Agenda , 2018 .

[9]  A. Meade,et al.  Identifying careless responses in survey data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[10]  Colleen Macklin,et al.  Games, Design and Play: A detailed approach to iterative game design , 2016 .

[11]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[12]  Richard D. Arvey,et al.  MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING , 1990 .

[13]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[14]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  Correcting Misconceptions About Gamification of Assessment: More Than SJTs and Badges , 2016, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[15]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[16]  Erica N. Drew,et al.  Candidate Reactions to Simulations and Media-Rich Assessments in Personnel Selection , 2013 .

[17]  M. A. Campion,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS) , 2001 .

[18]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  The State of Research on Situational Judgment Tests: A Content Analysis and Directions for Future Research , 2014 .

[19]  Donald M. Truxillo,et al.  Applicant Reactions to Different Selection Technology: Face-to-Face, Interactive Voice Response, and Computer-Assisted Telephone Screening Interviews , 2004 .

[20]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[21]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  Defining gameful experience as a psychological state caused by gameplay: Replacing the term 'Gamefulness' with three distinct constructs , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research , 2009 .

[23]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[24]  R. Hogan,et al.  New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World? , 2016, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  D. Hristopulos Simulations , 2020, Advances in Geographic Information Science.

[26]  R. Landers The Existential Threats to I-O Psychology Highlighted by Rapid Technological Change , 2019, The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior.

[27]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Measuring Attraction to Organizations , 2003 .

[29]  U. Kanning,et al.  From the Subjects' Point of View , 2006 .

[30]  Craig M. Reddock,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Objective Learner Control in Web-based Instruction , 2016, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[31]  Sven Kepes,et al.  How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? , 2013, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[32]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Situational Judgment Tests : Theory, Measurement, and Application , 2013 .

[33]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  The Lens of Intrinsic Skill Atoms: A Method for Gameful Design , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..