The Phantom in the Mirror: A Modified Rubber-Hand Illusion in Amputees and Normals

The bodily boundaries in amputees may seem to be more malleable than in non-amputees, given the propensity for a phantom limb to embody a mirror-reflected hand. However, in the present investigation, in which phantom-limb illusions within body space are induced and manipulated, we found that perceiving phantom sensations and illusory embodiment does not require amputation. Surprisingly, in the present modified rubber-hand illusion, we found that simultaneous stroking or stimulation of the participant's target hand was not necessary to induce illusions of embodiment and corresponding perceptual illusions. We tested this upper-limb paradigm in fourteen upper-limb amputees and twenty-six controls (including fourteen lower-limb amputees). We propose a model for embodiment of a rubber or real hand passively observed in a mirror. In this model, passive observation of the hand in the mirror triggers body representations (body image and body schema), most likely through activation of the posterior parietal cortex and temporo-parietal junction. Activity in these regions heightens awareness of peripersonal space and increases tactile sensitivity, and may subsequently enhance perception of illusory touch and embodiment. Furthermore, sense of embodiment may be more apparent to the participant when the hand is threatened; however, embodiment may even be strengthened when the motor system is engaged, evoking motor schemata to support the more easily induced perceptual embodiment via body image.

[1]  M. Botvinick Probing the Neural Basis of Body Ownership , 2004, Science.

[2]  Malcolm MacLachlan,et al.  Psychological correlates of illusory body experiences. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  J. Lackner Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  S. Miyauchi,et al.  Mirror visual feedback alleviates deafferentation pain, depending on qualitative aspects of the pain: a preliminary report. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[5]  P. Haggard,et al.  Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans , 2001, Current Biology.

[6]  J. Brasil-Neto,et al.  Feeling Pain in the Rubber Hand: Integration of Visual, Proprioceptive, and Painful Stimuli , 2009, Perception.

[7]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]  Tony Ro,et al.  Visual Enhancing of Tactile Perception in the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Rubber Hands Feel the Touch of Light , 2007, Psychological science.

[10]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  The rubber hand illusion in action , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Charles Spence,et al.  Is mirror therapy all it is cracked up to be? Current evidence and future directions , 2008, PAIN.

[13]  R. Dolan,et al.  Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Neil Roberts,et al.  Role for human posterior parietal cortex in visual processing of aversive objects in peripersonal space. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  A. J. Harris,et al.  Cortical origin of pathological pain , 1999, The Lancet.

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[17]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Behavioural Brain Research , 1999 .

[18]  M. Graziano Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Renzi,et al.  Imitation and utilisation behaviour. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  B. Gangadhar,et al.  Stroke with supernumerary phantom limb: case study, review of literature and pathogenesis , 2008, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[21]  C. Moore,et al.  Movement and the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2009, Perception.

[22]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. , 1986 .

[23]  F. Pavani,et al.  The Role of Hand Size in the Fake-Hand Illusion Paradigm , 2007, Perception.

[24]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[25]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Mechanisms underlying embodiment, disembodiment and loss of embodiment , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[26]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  C. Spence,et al.  Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Touching the phantom limb , 1995, Nature.

[33]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[34]  O. Blanke Out of body experiences and their neural basis , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.