FIRST EXPERIENCES WITH A NOVEL FARMER CITIZEN SCIENCE APPROACH: CROWDSOURCING PARTICIPATORY VARIETY SELECTION THROUGH ON-FARM TRIADIC COMPARISONS OF TECHNOLOGIES (TRICOT)

Rapid climatic and socio-economic changes challenge current agricultural R&D capacity. The necessary quantum leap in knowledge generation should build on the innovation capacity of farmers themselves. A novel citizen science methodology, triadic comparisons of technologies or tricot, was implemented in pilot studies in India, East Africa, and Central America. The methodology involves distributing a pool of agricultural technologies in different combinations of three to individual farmers who observe these technologies under farm conditions and compare their performance. Since the combinations of three technologies overlap, statistical methods can piece together the overall performance ranking of the complete pool of technologies. The tricot approach affords wide scaling, as the distribution of trial packages and instruction sessions is relatively easy to execute, farmers do not need to be organized in collaborative groups, and feedback is easy to collect, even by phone. The tricot approach provides interpretable, meaningful results and was widely accepted by farmers. The methodology underwent improvement in data input formats. A number of methodological issues remain: integrating environmental analysis, capturing gender-specific differences, stimulating farmers' motivation, and supporting implementation with an integrated digital platform. Future studies should apply the tricot approach to a wider range of technologies, quantify its potential contribution to climate adaptation, and embed the approach in appropriate institutions and business models, empowering participants and democratizing science.

[1]  Boleslo E. Romero,et al.  A quasi-global precipitation time series for drought monitoring , 2014 .

[2]  Glenn Hyman,et al.  Spatial analysis to support geographic targeting of genotypes to environments , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[3]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[4]  S. Ongeri Strategies for the industrialization of Africa , 1989 .

[5]  J. Sumberg,et al.  Farmers' Experiments: Creating Local Knowledge , 1997 .

[6]  B. Sthapit,et al.  ENHANCING ON-FARM VARIETAL DIVERSITY THROUGH PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTION: A CASE STUDY FOR CHAITE RICE IN NEPAL , 1997, Experimental Agriculture.

[7]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  Collecting weather data in the field with high spatial and temporal resolution using iButtons , 2013 .

[8]  G. Martin,et al.  Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual , 1995 .

[9]  J. Bentley What farmers don't know can't help them: The strengths and weaknesses of indigenous technical knowledge in Honduras , 1989 .

[10]  F. Eeuwijk Interpreting genotype-by-environment interaction using redundancy analysis , 1992, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  R. Coe Analyzing Ranking and Rating Data from Participatory On-Farm Trials , 2002 .

[12]  J. Voltas,et al.  Use of biplot analysis and factorial regression for the investigation of superior genotypes in multi-environment trials , 2005 .

[13]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  Crowdsourcing Crop Improvement in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Proposal for a Scalable and Inclusive Approach to Food Security , 2011 .

[14]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[15]  James S. Boster,et al.  Exchange of Varieties and Information Between Aguaruna Manioc Cultivators , 1986 .

[16]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy , 1986 .

[17]  D. Lobell,et al.  Food security and food production systems , 2017 .

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  A. Nishida,et al.  Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine Open Access the Lunar-tide Cycle Viewed by Crustacean and Mollusc Gatherers in the State of Paraíba, Northeast Brazil and Their Influence in Collection Attitudes , 2006 .

[20]  J. Witcombe,et al.  Participatory varietal selection in rice in Nepal in favourable agricultural environments – A comparison of two methods assessed by varietal adoption , 2002, Euphytica.

[21]  C. Johansen,et al.  PARTICIPATORY PLANT BREEDING IS BETTER DESCRIBED AS HIGHLY CLIENT-ORIENTED PLANT BREEDING. I. FOUR INDICATORS OF CLIENT-ORIENTATION IN PLANT BREEDING , 2005, Experimental Agriculture.

[22]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[23]  Jonathan Steinke Citizen science with resource-poor farmers as a new approach to climate adaption and food security: Evidence from Honduras , 2015 .

[24]  C. Leclerc,et al.  Social process of adaptation to environmental changes: how Eastern African societies intervene between crops and climate. , 2014 .

[25]  K. Duijvendijk Feasibility of a low-cost weather sensor network for agricultural purposes : a preliminary assessment , 2015 .

[26]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[27]  Jacob van Etten Changes in farmers' knowledge of maize diversity in highland Guatemala, 1927/37-2004 , 2006, Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine.

[28]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  The Lens of Intrinsic Skill Atoms: A Method for Gameful Design , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  Changes in farmers' knowledge of maize diversity in highland Guatemala, 1927/37-2004 , 2006 .

[30]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research , 2012 .

[31]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[32]  K. Zimmerer MANAGING DIVERSITY IN POTATO AND MAIZE FIELDS OF THE PERUVIAN ANDES , 1991 .

[33]  Jane Reeves,et al.  Quantitative analysis of data from participatory methods in plant breeding , 2002 .

[34]  David Firth,et al.  Bradley-Terry Models in R: The BradleyTerry2 Package , 2012 .

[35]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers , 2017, PloS one.

[36]  Yunbi Xu,et al.  Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[37]  E. Hand,et al.  Citizen science: People power , 2010, Nature.

[38]  P. Richards How Does Participation Work? Deliberation and Performance in African Food Security , 2005 .

[39]  Allen Johnson Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture , 1972 .

[40]  S. Snapp Quantifying Farmer Evaluation of Technologies: The Mother and Baby Trial Design , 2002 .

[41]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  The Rural Household Multi-Indicator Survey (RHoMIS) for rapid characterisation of households to inform climate smart agriculture interventions: Description and applications in East Africa and Central America , 2017 .

[42]  E. P. Guimarães,et al.  Plant breeding and farmer participation. , 2009 .

[43]  J. Boster Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: Evidence from aguaruna cultivars ofManihot esculenta , 1985, Economic Botany.

[44]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Extended Beta Regression in R: Shaken, Stirred, Mixed, and Partitioned , 2012 .

[45]  M. Misiko Dilemma in participatory selection of varieties , 2013 .

[46]  D. Lobell,et al.  Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials , 2011 .