Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias

Hypothetical bias is a persistent problem in stated preference studies. We propose and test a method for reducing hypothetical bias based on the cognitive dissonance literature in social psychology. A central element of this literature is that people prefer not to take inconsistent stands and will change their attitudes and behaviour to make them consistent. We find that participants in a stated preference willingness-to-pay study, when told that a nonhypothetical study of similar goods would follow, state significantly lower willingness to pay (WTP) than participants not so informed. In other words, participants adjust their stated WTP to avoid cognitive dissonance, that is, taking inconsistent stands on their WTP for the good being offered. Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2010; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.

[1]  James J. Murphy,et al.  Contingent Valuation, Hypothetical Bias, and Experimental Economics , 2004, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[2]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[3]  John A. List,et al.  Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards , 2001 .

[4]  John A. List,et al.  Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment , 1998 .

[5]  S. Navrud,et al.  Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: Assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats , 2006 .

[6]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[7]  A. Nederhof.  Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. , 1985 .

[8]  H. Jensen,et al.  Discounting Spotted Apples: Investigating Consumers' Willingness to Accept Cosmetic Damage in an Organic Product , 2006, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[9]  John A. List,et al.  What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? , 2001 .

[10]  Frode Alfnes.  Valuing product attributes in Vickrey auctions when market substitutes are available. , 2009 .

[11]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[12]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2008 .

[13]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[14]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency , 2008 .

[15]  Frode Alfnes,et al.  Consumers' Willingness to Pay for the Color of Salmon: A Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives , 2006 .

[16]  R. Fisher.  Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[17]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[18]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[19]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[20]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .

[21]  J. Shogren,et al.  Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research , 2007 .

[22]  Glenn W. Harrison.  Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods , 2005 .

[23]  Social Psychology Sixth Edition , 1990 .

[24]  Aroldo Rodrígues,et al.  The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective , 1970 .

[25]  Arthur J. Caplan,et al.  Cheap Talk Reconsidered: New Evidence From CVM , 2006 .

[26]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective1 , 1969 .

[27]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[28]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews , 2003, Land Economics.