Design Implications for Improving an Anthropomorphic Test Device based on Human Body Simulations

To evaluate new restraint systems more advanced test tools are required. To guide the design of an Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) torso, simulations were performed with the LS-DYNA and RADIOSS codes using two human body models: an improved Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) version 3.0 and the HUMOS2LAB model. The baseline models were modified by removing a selection of internal organs, changing tissue stiffness and density, and/or blocking spinal joints to resemble ATD-like simplifications. Experimental setups with loading to the chest from an impactor, belts and airbag were simulated and the rib strains, mid sternal deflection and differential deflections from other assessment points on the rib cage, and thoracic effective stiffness were compared. Changing the material properties of intercostal muscles, ribs and sternum had the greatest influence on the differential deflections. Removing internal organs resulted in a global stiffness decrease of the thorax. However, it does not change the main features of the rib strain profile. If the lack of internal organs is compensated in an ATD by using stiffer rib materials, the differential deflections will decrease. There is a compromise between stiffness and mass representation in order to measure biofidelic differential chest deflections.

[1]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Age-related Changes in the Effective Stiffness of the Human Thorax Using Four Loading Conditions , 2003 .

[2]  David Lessley,et al.  Thoracic response to dynamic, non-impact loading from a hub, distributed belt, diagonal belt, and double diagonal belts. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[3]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[4]  Max Cameron,et al.  SARAC: safety rating based on real-world crashes for supplementation of new car assessment programs , 2003 .

[5]  Kazuo Miki,et al.  Development of a finite element model of the human body , 2002 .

[6]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE TOTAL HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY (THUMS) AND APPLICATION TO INJURY RECONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[7]  Greg Shaw,et al.  Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[8]  Toshikazu Torigaki,et al.  Finite element analysis of hard and soft tissue contributions to thoracic response: sensitivity analysis of fluctuations in boundary conditions. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[9]  R. Kent Frontal thoracic response to dynamic loading: the role of superficial tissues, viscera and the rib cage , 2008 .

[10]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  Effect of assumed stiffness and mass density on the impact response of the human chest using a three-dimensional FE model of the human body. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  James Patrie,et al.  The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[12]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Laboratory Reconstructions of Real World Frontal Crash Configurations using the Hybrid III and THOR Dummies and PMHS. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[13]  Krystoffer Mroz,et al.  Validation of a Human Body Model for Frontal Crash and its Use for Chest Injury Prediction , 2008 .

[14]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Development of Injury Criteria for Frontal Impact Using a Human Body FE Model , 2011 .

[15]  N. Rangarajan,et al.  Development of THOR NT: enhancement of THOR Alpha-the NHTSA advanced frontal dummy , 2005 .

[16]  S. Robin,et al.  HUMOS: HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY - A JOINT EFFORT TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF REFINED HUMAN-LIKE CAR OCCUPANT MODELS , 2001 .

[17]  Jaeho Shin,et al.  Evaluation of a thor dummy rigid-body model in frontal crash environment using objective rating techniques - biomed 2009. , 2009, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[18]  Ola Boström,et al.  Comparison of Hybrid III and Human Body Models in Evaluating Thoracic Response for Various Seat Belt and Airbag Loading Conditions , 2010 .

[19]  Katsuya Furusu,et al.  Fundamental study of side impact analysis using the finite element model of the human thorax , 2001 .

[20]  J Forman,et al.  Biomechanical considerations for the optimization of an advanced restraint system: assessing the benefit of a second shoulder belt , 2005 .

[21]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Evaluation of thoracic deflection as an injury criterion for side impact using a finite elements thorax model. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[22]  Li Chai,et al.  Prediction and analysis of human thoracic impact responses and injuries in cadaver impacts using a full human body finite element model. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.