BYOD strategies in higher education: current knowledge, students’ perspectives, and challenges.

The use of mobile computing devices has become an integral part of virtually every aspect of our personal and professional life, and education is no exception to this paradigm. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategies are becoming increasingly prevalent in teaching, learning and assessment across all age groups, however the evaluation of their relative effectiveness compared to traditional pedagogies is still a controversial matter. Despite the vast number of reports attesting the successful integration of BYOD in higher education, it has been argued that a significant proportion of the studies on the topic are highly heterogeneous from both a theoretical and methodological standpoint. While BYOD strategies have been put in place in an increasing number of educational institutions around the world, the extent of their implementation varies widely between (and in most cases within) different institutions. This observation highlights the critical importance of the development of a solid theoretical and practical framework to underpin the integration of BYOD in higher education. The first part of this paper will aim to critically evaluate the state of the art of the literature on the efficacy of BYOD strategies in higher education, highlighting potential benefits and drawbacks. As a paradigmatic example of caveats arising from the use of BYOD in higher education, it has been argued that teaching and learning strategies based on the use of personal mobile computing devices may pose a significant risk to aggravate digital divide between students who have access to (and operational mastery of) such devices, and students who do not. The critical evaluation of the advantages and pitfalls of BYOD will be used as a theoretical scaffold for the second part of the paper, which will outline the results of a recent case study to give a practical account of the implementation of BYOD in higher education. A survey was carried out within a cohort of level 4 Biology, Biochemistry, and Marine Biology students to investigate the students’ perception of the effectiveness of Nearpod as a formative assessment tool. While the majority (65%) of the participants had never used BYOD in an educational context before enrolling into university, the students’ account of its efficacy appears overwhelmingly positive. Most students expressed a clear preference for electronic formative assessment and commended its superior helpfulness compared to traditional methods. The vast majority of the participants (over 90%) did not perceive BYOD as potentially aggravating digital divide among their peers. Keywords: BYOD; higher education; electronic; interactive; formative assessment; digital divide; personal computing devices; smartphone; tablet; laptop.

[1]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[2]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education , 1999 .

[3]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Web-Based Learning Environments , 2000 .

[4]  C. Boston The Concept of Formative Assessment. , 2002 .

[5]  Mantz Yorke Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .

[6]  Heidi Norrström Multiple Case Study , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  Thomas H. P. Gould Hybrid Classes: Maximizing Institutional Resources and Student Learning , 2003 .

[8]  Michael Rohs,et al.  BYOD: bring your own device , 2004 .

[9]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Producing guidelines for learning, teaching and tutoring in a mobile environment , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[10]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[12]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Buket Akkoyunlu,et al.  A Study on Students’ Views On Blended Learning Environment , 2006 .

[14]  Luvai Motiwalla,et al.  Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[15]  R. Ellis,et al.  Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[16]  Joseph Rene Corbeil,et al.  Are You Ready for Mobile Learning , 2007 .

[17]  S. Gulati Technology-Enhanced Learning in Developing Nations: A Review. , 2008 .

[18]  Jan Herrington,et al.  New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education , 2009 .

[19]  Gina Saliba,et al.  Blended learning , 2010, BDJ.

[20]  Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Anuradha Mathrani,et al.  Bridging Digital Divides in the Learning Process: Challenges and Implications of Integrating ICTs , 2012, mLearn.

[22]  Dean Cristol,et al.  Academic Achievement in BYOD Classrooms , 2013 .

[23]  Steven E. Higgins,et al.  Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students' achievement in higher education , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[24]  T. Cochrane,et al.  Riding the wave of BYOD: developing a framework for creative pedagogies , 2014 .

[25]  Mohammed Ketel,et al.  Bring Your Own Device: Benefits, risks and control techniques , 2014, IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2014.

[26]  Jürgen Jarosch,et al.  Mobile Learning , 2014, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[27]  Casey J Gordon Addressing security risks for mobile devices: What higher education leaders should know , 2015 .

[28]  Clayton Shepard,et al.  You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him learn: Smartphone use in higher education , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Kathryn MacCallum,et al.  A Multiple Case Study Approach Exploring Innovation, Pedagogical Transformation and Inclusion for Mobile Learning , 2015, mLearn.

[30]  Cornwell Dr,et al.  Implementing Bring Your Own Device and the Paperless Classroom: A Change Leadership Project , 2015 .

[31]  Sharon lee Altena Implementing iPads as Personal Learning Devices: Making the paperless MBA possible , 2015 .

[32]  Joshua M. Rosenberg,et al.  The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition ( SAMR ) Model 1 The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition ( SAMR ) Model : A Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use , 2016 .

[33]  T. Cochrane,et al.  Nurturing global collaboration and networked learning in higher education , 2016 .

[34]  Anuradha Mathrani,et al.  Bring Your Own Devices classroom: Exploring the issue of digital divide in the teaching and learning contexts , 2016, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[35]  David Parsons,et al.  Bring your own device to secondary school: The perceptions of teachers, students and parents. , 2016 .

[36]  K. Mclean The Implementation of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in Primary [Elementary] Schools , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[37]  Servel Miller,et al.  Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges , 2017 .