Duality, efficiency computations and interpretations in imprecise DEA

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has proven to be a useful tool for assessing efficiency or productivity of organizations which is of vital practical importance in managerial decision making. While DEA assumes exact input and output data, the development of imprecise DEA (IDEA) broadens the scope of applications to efficiency evaluations involving imprecise information which implies various forms of ordinal and bounded data possibly or often occurring in practice. The primary purpose of this article is to characterize the variable efficiency in IDEA. Since DEA describes a pair of primal and dual models, also called envelopment and multiplier models, we can basically consider two IDEA models: One incorporates imprecise data into envelopment model and the other includes the same imprecise data in multiplier model. The issues of rising importance are thus the relationships between the two models and how to solve them. The groundwork we will make includes a duality study, which makes it possible to characterize the efficiency solutions from the two models and link with the efficiency bounds and classifications that some of the published IDEA studies have done. The other purposes are to present computational aspects of the efficiency bounds and how to interpret the efficiency solutions. The computational method developed here extends the previous IDEA method to effectively incorporate a more general form of strict ordinal data and partial orders in its framework, which in turn overcomes some drawbacks of the previous approaches. The interpretation of the resulting efficiency is also important but we have never seen it before.

[1]  L. Seiford,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors , 1996 .

[2]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[3]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Rank order data in DEA: A general framework , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data , 1999, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  On the Use of Ordinal Data in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[6]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Gang Yu,et al.  An Illustrative Application of Idea (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2001, Oper. Res..

[8]  K. S. Park,et al.  Simplification of the transformations and redundancy of assurance regions in IDEA (imprecise DEA) , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  William W. Cooper,et al.  IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) with CMDs (Column Maximum Decision Making Units) , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[14]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[15]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with missing data: an application to University libraries in Taiwan , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Qualitative factors in data envelopment analysis: A fuzzy number approach , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[18]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Probabilistic Bounds on the Virtual Multipliers in Data Envelopment Analysis: Polyhedral Cone Constraints , 1999 .

[19]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[20]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  K. S. Park,et al.  Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  Behnam Malakooti,et al.  Ranking and screening multiple criteria alternatives with partial information and use of ordinal and cardinal strength of preferences , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[23]  P. S. Dharmapala,et al.  Linked-cone DEA profit ratios and technical efficiency with application to Illinois coal mines , 1995 .

[24]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise DEA via Standard Linear DEA Models with a Revisit to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2004, Oper. Res..

[26]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  Operations research : methods, models, and applications , 1998 .

[27]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Efficiency evaluation with strong ordinal input and output measures , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information , 1997 .