The aim of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of a seismic retrofit technique that involves the introduction of energy dissipation devices properly connected to an existing structure through a system of cables and levers, which are employed to amplify total or inter-story drift at device end. One of the main topics related to the introduction of energy dissipation devices, lies in the choice of their optimal setting within the structure to maximize the effectiveness without producing functionality limitations. The achievement of these objectives is, therefore, linked, regardless of the type adopted, to the amount of energy dissipated in each cycle, directly proportional to the displacement magnitude to which the device is subject. Many configurations proposed in the literature and currently adopted in professional practice provide additional dissipation systems variously connected to braces installed inside the structural frame and, therefore, able to exploit the inter-story drift produced by seismic input. The proposed system exploits top displacements of the structure with respect to the foundation level, transferred to the device through a system of cables properly configured and amplified with leverage. This paper represents the first step of the research, in which simple single degree of freedom (SDOF) or two degrees of freedom (2-DOF) models are taken into account to evaluate the effects of the introduction of the proposed system in terms of reducing the seismic demand on the structure, proceeding to a parametric analysis to obtain initial indications for the design of the system in relation to the geometric and inertial characteristics of the original structure.
[1]
Stefano Sorace,et al.
Motion control-based seismic retrofit solutions for a R/C school building designed with earlier Technical Standards
,
2014,
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[2]
Panos Tsopelas,et al.
TOGGLE-BRACE-DAMPER SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION SYSTEMS
,
2001
.
[3]
Nathan M. Newmark,et al.
A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics
,
1959
.
[4]
Stuart S. Chen,et al.
Balancing Lateral Loads Using Tendon-Based Supplemental Damping System
,
2000
.
[5]
Stefano Sorace,et al.
The damped cable system for seismic protection of frame structures — Part II: Design and application
,
2012
.
[6]
Hiroshi Tagawa,et al.
Seismic response of steel structures with seesaw systems using viscoelastic dampers
,
2013
.
[7]
Michael C. Constantinou,et al.
Scissor-Jack-Damper Energy Dissipation System
,
2003
.
[9]
Stefano Berton,et al.
Amplification System for Supplemental Damping Devices in Seismic Applications
,
2005
.
[10]
Roberto Paolucci,et al.
Ground Motion Record Selection Based on Broadband Spectral Compatibility
,
2014
.
[11]
Stefano Sorace,et al.
Non-linear dynamic modelling and design procedure of FV spring- dampers for base isolation
,
2001
.
[12]
Gloria Terenzi,et al.
Dynamics of SDOF Systems with Nonlinear Viscous Damping
,
1999
.