Realization and representation of Nepali laryngeal contrasts: Voiced aspirates and laryngeal realism

Abstract Theories of laryngeal realism argue for a tight correspondence between a segment’s phonetic cues and the (laryngeal) phonological features that represent it. As such, the ‘p’/‘b’ contrast in French, expressed phonetically by vocal fold vibration during the stop closure, is represented by a [voice] feature while the ‘p’/‘b’ contrast in English, expressed phonetically by contrasting long and short lag VOT, is represented by a [spread] feature. Laryngeal realist literature focuses on whether a given segment is best represented by [voice] or [spread], and proposes a set of criteria and tests by which to diagnose the representation. In this study we push laryngeal realist theory in a new direction – to segments proposed to be specified for both [voice] and [spread] features – a combination which poses challenges to the current diagnostics. To do so, we analyze acoustic data from Nepali, an Indic (a.k.a. Indo-Aryan) language with a single class of stops described as both voiced and aspirated. We apply the same criteria and diagnostics used in laryngeal realism. We find support for the proposed representation, with a caveat that the [voice] feature appears ‘stronger’ than [spread].

[1]  Diana Archangeli,et al.  Aspects of underspecification theory , 1988, Phonology.

[2]  Bert Vaux,et al.  Laryngeal markedness and aspiration , 2005, Phonology.

[3]  Kelly Berkson,et al.  Capturing Breathy Voice: Durational Measures of Oral Stops in Marathi , 2012 .

[4]  Kelly Berkson,et al.  Phonation Types in Marathi: An Acoustic Investigation. , 2013 .

[5]  Jayaraj Acharya A Descriptive Grammar Of Nepali And An Analyzed Corpus , 1991 .

[6]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English , 1997 .

[7]  Kerry P. Green,et al.  A Cross-Language Comparison of Speaking Rate Effects on the Production of Voice Onset Time in English and Spanish , 1999, Phonetica.

[8]  G. K. Iverson,et al.  Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic , 1995, Phonology.

[9]  Jason Brown,et al.  Laryngeal assimilation, markedness and typology* , 2016, Phonology.

[10]  J. Ohala The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[11]  Rajesh Khatiwada,et al.  PHONETIC REALIZATION OF CONTRASTIVELY ASPIRATED AFFRICATES IN NEPALI , 2007 .

[12]  P. Keating PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING , 1984 .

[13]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[14]  L. Lombardi Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[15]  Diana Archangeli,et al.  Language - Particular Underspecification : Gengbe /e/ and Yoruba /i/ , 1989 .

[16]  L. Lombardi Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization , 1997 .

[17]  Katharine Davis,et al.  Stop Voicing in Hindi , 1994 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[19]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[21]  Indranil Dutta,et al.  Four -way stop contrasts in Hindi: An acoustic study of voicing, fundamental frequency and spectral tilt , 2007 .

[22]  C. Mateer,et al.  A Study of VOT in Nepali Stop Consonants , 1985 .

[23]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .

[24]  Pavel Iosad,et al.  Representation and variation in substance-free phonology: a case study in Celtic , 2013 .

[25]  Harlan Lane,et al.  Speaking rate , voice-onset time , and quantity : The search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues , 2002 .

[26]  Richard Wiese,et al.  The Phonology of German , 1996 .

[27]  John Harris,et al.  English Sound Structure , 1994 .

[28]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Deriving natural classes in phonology , 2005 .

[29]  Charles Reiss,et al.  Substance Free phonology , 2017 .

[30]  Rachid Ridouane,et al.  Language-independent bases of distinctive features , 2011 .

[31]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[32]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions , 2017, J. Phonetics.

[33]  Charles Reiss,et al.  The Phonological Enterprise , 2008 .

[34]  Gillian Gallagher,et al.  Natural classes in cooccurrence constraints , 2015 .

[35]  Patrick Honeybone,et al.  Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: the case of obstruent laryngeal specifications , 2004 .

[36]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .

[37]  Catherine Ringen,et al.  Laryngeal features in German , 2002, Phonology.

[38]  Jill Beckman,et al.  Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages1 , 2013, Journal of Linguistics.

[39]  W. Jansen Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing : a laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch , 2004 .

[40]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[41]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Caught in the ACT: The Timing of Aspiration and Voicing in East Bengali , 2007, Language and speech.

[42]  William J. Idsardi,et al.  Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement , 2000 .

[43]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[44]  Diana Archangeli,et al.  Yoruba vowel harmony , 1989 .

[45]  Michael Ramsammy,et al.  From phonetic enhancement to phonological underspecification: hybrid voicing contrast in European Portuguese , 2016 .

[46]  Bernd Möbius Corpus-Based Investigations on the Phonetics of Consonant Voicing , 2004 .

[47]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[48]  Jerzy Rubach,et al.  Final devoicing and cyclic syllabification in German , 1990 .

[49]  Daniel Pape,et al.  Production and perception of velar stop (de)voicing in European Portuguese and Italian , 2014, EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music. Process..

[50]  Gregory K. Iverson,et al.  Legacy Specification in the Laryngeal Phonology of Dutch , 2003, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.