Purpose
Cross tables are omnipresent in management, academia and popular culture. The Matrix has us, despite all criticism, opposition and desire for a way out. This paper draws on the works of three agents of the matrix. The paper shows that Niklas Luhmann criticised Talcott Parsons’ traditional matrix model of society and proceeded to update systems theory, the latest version of which is coded in the formal language of George Spencer Brown. As Luhmann failed to install his updates to all components of his theory platform, however, regular reoccurrences of Parsonian crosstabs are observed, particularly in the Luhmannian differentiation theory, which results in compatibility issues and produces error messages requesting updates. This paper aims to code the missing update translating the basic matrix structure from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper draws on work by Boris Hennig and Louis Kauffman and a yet unpublished manuscript by George Spencer Brown, to demonstrate that the latter introduced his cross as a mark to indicate NOR gates in circuit diagrams. The paper also shows that this NOR gate marker has been taken out of and may be observed to contain the tetralemma, an ancient matrix structure already present in traditional Indian logic. It then proceeds to translate the basic structure of traditional contingency tables into a Spencer Brownian NOR equation and to demonstrate the difference this translation makes in the modelling of social systems.
Findings
The translation of cross tables from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language results in the design of a both matrix-shaped and compatible test routine that works as a virtual window for the observation of the actually unobservable medium in which a form is drawn, and can be used for consistency checks of expressions coded in Spencer Brownian formal language.
Originality/value
This paper quotes from and discusses a so far unpublished manuscript finalised by Spencer Brown in April 1961. The basic matrix structure is translated from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language. A Spencer Brownian NOR matrix is coded that may be used to detect errors in expressions coded in Spencer Brownian formal language.
[1]
D. Baecker,et al.
The Form of the Firm
,
2006
.
[2]
B. Hennig.
Luhmann und die Formale Mathematik
,
2000
.
[3]
M. Lehmann.
Das „Altwerden funktionaler Differenzierung“ und die „nächste Gesellschaft“
,
2015
.
[4]
Talcott Parsons,et al.
Pattern Variables Revisited: A Response to Robert Dubin
,
1960
.
[5]
Steffen Roth.
Free Economy! On 3628800 Alternatives of and to Capitalism
,
2015
.
[6]
Dirk Baecker,et al.
Communication With Computers, or How Next Society Calls for an Understanding of Temporal Form
,
2007
.
[7]
V. Valentinov,et al.
The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: a systems-theory perspective
,
2017
.
[8]
Jack Engstrom.
C. S. Peirce's precursors to Laws of Form
,
2001,
Cybern. Hum. Knowing.
[9]
Jan Künzler.
Medien und Gesellschaft : die Medienkonzepte von Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann
,
1989
.
[10]
L. Kauffman.
NETWORK SYNTHESIS AND VARELA'S CALCULUS
,
1978
.
[11]
N. Luhmann,et al.
Theory of society/2
,
2012
.
[12]
Wendy K. Smith,et al.
Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem
,
2017
.
[13]
Ranulph Glanville.
Inventing the new millennium
,
1999,
Cybern. Hum. Knowing.
[14]
Heinz Weihrich,et al.
The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis
,
1982
.
[15]
Wendy K. Smith,et al.
TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING
,
2011
.
[16]
K. N. Jayatilleke.
The Logic of Four Alternatives
,
1967
.
[17]
Louis H. Kauffman,et al.
The mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce
,
2001,
Cybern. Hum. Knowing.
[18]
Jason T Jay,et al.
Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations
,
2013
.