Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.

CONTEXT Health values (utilities or preferences for health states) are often incorporated into clinical decisions and health care policy when issues of quality vs length of life arise, but little is known about health values of the very old. OBJECTIVE To assess health values of older hospitalized patients, compare their values with those of their surrogate decision makers, investigate possible determinants of health values, and determine whether health values change over time. DESIGN A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study. SETTING Four academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS Four hundred fourteen hospitalized patients aged 80 years or older and their surrogate decision makers who were interviewed and understood the task. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Time-trade-off utilities, reflecting preferences for current health relative to a shorter but healthy life. RESULTS On average, patients equated living 1 year in their current state of health with living 9.7 months in excellent health (mean [SD] utility, 0.81 [0.28]). Although only 126 patients (30.7%) rated their current quality of life as excellent or very good, 284 (68.6%) were willing to give up at most 1 month of 12 in exchange for excellent health (utility > or =0.92). At the other extreme, 25 (6.0%) were willing to live 2 weeks or less in excellent health rather than 1 year in their current state of health (utility < or =0.04). Patients were willing to trade significantly less time for a healthy life than their surrogates assumed they would (mean difference, 0.05; P=.007); 61 surrogates (20.3%) underestimated the patient's time-trade-off score by 0.25 (3 months of 12) or more. Patients willing to trade less time for better health were more likely to want resuscitation and other measures to extend life. Time-trade-off score correlated only modestly with quality-of-life rating (r=0.28) and inversely with depression score (r=-0.27), but there were few other clinical or demographic predictors of health values. When patients who survived were asked the time-trade-off question again at 1 year, they were willing to trade less time for better health than at baseline (mean difference, 0.04; P=.04). CONCLUSION Very old hospitalized patients who could be interviewed were able, in most cases, to have their health values assessed using the time-trade-off technique. Most patients were unwilling to trade much time for excellent health, but preferences varied greatly. Because proxies and multivariable analyses cannot gauge health values of elderly hospitalized patients accurately, health values of the very old should be elicited directly from the patient.

[1]  M. Mcgrath Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1998 .

[2]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[3]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults: Do We Spend Less on Older Patients? , 1996, Journal of The American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  J. Bosch,et al.  The Relationship between Descriptive and Valuational Quality-of-life Measures in Patients with Intermittent Claudication , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[6]  A. Wu,et al.  Health Values of the Seriously Ill , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Health values of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Relationship to mental health and physical functioning. , 1996, Medical care.

[8]  J. Vaupel,et al.  Survival after the age of 80 in the United States, Sweden, France, England, and Japan. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  L. Rubenstein,et al.  A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Harold C. Sox,et al.  Variation in Patient Utilities for Outcomes of the Management of Chronic Stable Angina: Implications for Clinical Practice Guidelines , 1995 .

[11]  W. Knaus,et al.  Predicting Future Functional Status for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults: The SUPPORT Prognostic Model , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  The Impact of Serious Illness on Patients' Families , 1994 .

[13]  E. Cook,et al.  The impact of serious illness on patients' families. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  J P Kassirer,et al.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Duncan Neuhauser,et al.  Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation , 1994 .

[16]  P. Volberding,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of life associated with zidovudine treatment in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  G. Kolata Ethicists struggle to judge the 'value' of life. , 1992, The New York times on the Web.

[19]  D A Revicki,et al.  Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures. , 1992, Medical care.

[20]  W. Knaus,et al.  The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. , 1991, Chest.

[21]  L. Goldman,et al.  Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction. , 1991, Medical care.

[22]  A. Ciampi,et al.  Benign and Malignant Breast Disease , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  D C Hadorn,et al.  Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. , 1991, JAMA.

[24]  E. Lawlor,et al.  Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers. , 1990, JAMA.

[25]  Outcomes in SUPPORT. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  D. Matchar,et al.  Assessing quality of life and preferences in the seriously ill using utility theory. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  C. Coulton Decision making in SUPPORT: patient perceptions and preferences. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  W. Knaus,et al.  Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  J. La Puma,et al.  Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers. , 1990, JAMA.

[30]  L. Goldman,et al.  Patient characteristics in SUPPORT: activity status and cognitive function. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  M. Bergner,et al.  Patient characteristics in SUPPORT: functional status. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  D. Feeny,et al.  Utilities and Quality-Adjusted Life Years , 1989, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[33]  M A Hlatky,et al.  A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  M. Bergner Quality of Life, Health Status, and Clinical Research , 1989, Medical care.

[35]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  S G Pauker,et al.  The amniocentesis decision: ten years of decision analytic experience. , 1987, Birth defects original article series.

[37]  S G Pauker,et al.  Clinical decision consultation service. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[38]  S. Shacham,et al.  A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.

[39]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Clinical Decision Analysis , 1980 .

[40]  G W Torrance,et al.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. , 1972, Health services research.

[41]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.