How various aspects of motion parallax influence distance judgments, even when we think we are standing still.

It is well known that when we intentionally make large head movements, the resulting motion parallax helps us judge objects' distances. The information about distance could be obtained in various ways: from the changes in the object's position with respect to ourselves, from the changes in its orientation relative to the line of sight, and from the relative retinal motion between the target's image and that of the background. We explore here whether these motion parallax cues are used when we think we are standing still. To answer this question we asked subjects to indicate the position of a virtual target with their unseen finger. The position and the size of the target changed across trials. There were pairs of trials in which the same target was presented at the same location, except that one or more of the three motion parallax cues indicated that the target was either 10 cm closer or 10 cm farther away than the 'true' distance. Any systematic difference between the positions indicated for the closer and further targets of such pairs indicates that the cues in question influence subjects' judgments. The results show that motion parallax cues have a detectable influence on our judgments, even when the head only moves a few millimeters. Relative retinal image motion has the clearest effect. Subjects did not move their head differently when we presented the targets to only one eye in order to increase the benefit of considering motion parallax.

[1]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Does Size Matter? , 2012 .

[2]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Reweighting visual cues by touch. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[3]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  B. Day,et al.  Effect of vision and stance width on human body motion when standing: implications for afferent control of lateral sway. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency , 1973 .

[6]  J.B.J. Smeets,et al.  A new binocular cue for absolute distance: Disparity relative to the most distant structure , 2010, Vision Research.

[7]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues , 1994, Vision Research.

[8]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Judging an unfamiliar object's distance from its retinal image size. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[9]  J W Dees.  Accuracy of absolute visual distance and size estimation in space as a function of stereopsis and motion parallax. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Michele Rucci,et al.  Motion parallax from microscopic head movements during visual fixation , 2012, Vision Research.

[11]  Robert D. McIntosh,et al.  Matching boxes: Familiar size influences action programming , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Perceived motion in depth , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  S. H. Ferris.  Motion parallax and absolute distance. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Jeroen B. J. Smeets,et al.  Errors in visuo-haptic and haptic-haptic location matching are stable over long periods of time. , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  Adapting to monocular vision: grasping with one eye , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Cues to Viewing Distance for Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1998, Perception.

[17]  E. Brenner,et al.  Judging distance from ocular convergence , 1998, Vision Research.

[18]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[19]  M L Braunstein,et al.  Sensitivity of the observer to transformations of the visual field. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Eli Brenner,et al.  The effect of variability in other objects' sizes on the extent to which people rely on retinal image size as a cue for judging distance. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[21]  Joseph S. Lappin,et al.  Rogers and Graham's 1979 Paper , 2009 .

[22]  Yann Coello,et al.  Determination of target distance in a structured environment: Selection of visual information for action , 2000 .

[23]  Eli Brenner,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00162-X , 1998 .

[24]  Hans Wallach,et al.  The use of size matching to demonstrate the effectiveness of accommodation and convergence as cues for distance , 1971 .

[25]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[26]  A. Edwards,et al.  Body sway and vision. , 1946, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  The Perception of Spatial Layout from Static Optical Information , 1995 .

[28]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  People Favour Imperfect Catching by Assuming a Stable World , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  A Straube,et al.  Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[31]  T S Collett,et al.  The Interaction of Oculomotor Cues and Stimulus Size in Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1991, Perception.

[32]  E. Brenner,et al.  Judging surface slant for placing objects: a role for motion parallax , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[34]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Role of changes in accommodation and convergence in the perception of size. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[36]  Andrew E. Welchman,et al.  A surprising influence of retinal size on disparity-defined distance judgments , 2010 .

[37]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Depth perception in children enucleated at an early age , 1989 .

[38]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance , 1979, Vision Research.

[39]  Eli Brenner,et al.  The influence of previously seen objects' sizes in distance judgments. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[40]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect measure of perceived distance from oculomotor cues , 1977 .

[41]  J. Gibson,et al.  Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[43]  M J Steinbach,et al.  Motion parallax judgements of depth as a function of the direction and type of head movement. , 1991, Canadian journal of psychology.

[44]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Objects can be localized at positions that are inconsistent with the relative disparity between them. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[45]  B J Rogers,et al.  Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  W. A. van de Grind,et al.  Non-visual information in structure-from-motion. , 1996, Vision research.

[47]  B. Rogers,et al.  Simultaneous and Successive Contrast Effects in the Perception of Depth from Motion-Parallax and Stereoscopic Information , 1982, Perception.

[48]  Andrew Glennerster,et al.  The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information , 2000, Vision Research.

[49]  J J Marotta,et al.  The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation , 1995, Eye.

[50]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[51]  D H Ashmead,et al.  Postural sway of human infants while standing in light and dark. , 1991, Child development.

[52]  Brian Rogers,et al.  Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception: a retrospective. , 2009, Perception.