A passively safe and gravity-counterbalanced anthropomorphic robot arm

When designing a robot for human-safety during direct physical interaction, one approach is to size the robot's actuators to be physically incapable of exerting damaging impulses, even during a controller failure. Merely lifting the arms against their own weight may consume the entire available torque budget, preventing the rapid and expressive movement required for anthropomorphic robots. To mitigate this problem, gravity-counterbalancing of the arms is a common tactic; however, most designs adopt a shoulder singularity configuration which, while favorable for simple counterbalance design, has a range of motion better suited for industrial robot arms. In this paper we present a shoulder design using a novel differential mechanism to counterbalance the arm while preserving an anthropomorphically favorable singularity configuration and natural range-of-motion. Furthermore, because the motors driving the shoulder are completely grounded, counterbalance masses or springs are easily placed away from the shoulder and low in the torso, improving mass distribution and balance. A robot arm using this design is constructed and evaluated for counterbalance efficacy and backdrivability under closed-loop force control.

[1]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Black Falcon: a teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[2]  Just L. Herder,et al.  Design, actuation and control of an anthropomorphic robot arm , 2000 .

[3]  Michael Alexander,et al.  Passive exoskeletons for assisting limb movement. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  J. Taylor,et al.  Playing safe? , 1989, Nursing times.

[5]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Towards a personal robotics development platform: Rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Andrew Y. Ng,et al.  A low-cost compliant 7-DOF robotic manipulator , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Adapting human motion for the control of a humanoid robot , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[8]  Chih-Hung King,et al.  Towards an assistive robot that autonomously performs bed baths for patient hygiene , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  I. Kapandji The Physiology of the Joints , 1988 .

[10]  J. L. Herder,et al.  Energy-free systems: theory, conception, and design of statically balanced spring mechanisms , 2001 .

[11]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Playing it safe [human-friendly robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[12]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  Intrinsically Safe Robot Arm: Adjustable Static Balancing and Low Power Actuation , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS) , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  On the design of a statically balanced serial robot using remote counterweights , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Matthew Glisson,et al.  Playing catch and juggling with a humanoid robot , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012).

[16]  Sungchul Kang,et al.  Static balancing of a manipulator with hemispherical work space , 2010, 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[17]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance and Interaction Control , 2018 .