Horizontalism in the implementation of land redistribution program in Cipari Cilacap Indonesia

This study explains the dynamics of non-state actors’ involvement in implementing a land redistribution program in Cipari, Cilacap, Indonesia. The urgency of this study is the massive involvement of non-state actors in the implementation of land redistribution programs while lacking analysis found for the dimension of horizontalism in the implementation of public policies, especially related to the land redistribution program as a part of land reform policy programs in Indonesia. This study focuses on the involvement of non-state actors, the role of Street-Level Bureaucrats (SLBs), and the relationship between SLBs and Local Farmers Organizations (LFO). This study implemented a qualitative approach with a case study strategy. The key informants consisted of village heads, village officials, LFO administrators, and administrators of LFO advocate organizations. We performed observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation reviews for data collection and implemented thematic data analysis. Three main findings include the non-state actors’ involvements since the colonial era (pre-independence), the old order, the new order, to post-reformation, the role of SLBs as state actors dominating the implementation of the land redistribution program, and the negotiation relationship between SLBs and LFO showing the SLBs as the winner.

[1]  Alexis R. Kennedy,et al.  Land Reform and Welfare in Vietnam: Why Gender of the Land‐Rights Holder Matters , 2017 .

[2]  Dongwoo Yoo,et al.  Conditions of successful land reform: a study of Micronesia , 2016 .

[3]  N. V. P. Land Reforms, Land Markets and Urban Transformation , 2016 .

[4]  R. H. Pedersen,et al.  A Less Gendered Access to Land? The Impact of Tanzania's New Wave of Land Reform , 2015 .

[5]  Marina Stoshikj,et al.  Integrative and distributive negotiations and negotiation behavior , 2014, J. Serv. Sci. Res..

[6]  V. Mueller,et al.  Resettlement for Food Security’s Sake: Insights from a Malawi Land Reform Project , 2014, Land Economics.

[7]  Susie Jacobs Agrarian reforms , 2013 .

[8]  R. Jenkins Land, Rights and Reform in India , 2013 .

[9]  E. Ellis,et al.  Changing Landscapes for Forest Commons: Linking Land Tenure with Forest Cover Change Following Mexico’s 1992 Agrarian Counter-Reforms , 2013 .

[10]  Oliver Kaplan,et al.  Land Reform as a Counterinsurgency Policy , 2013 .

[11]  Matthew Hoffman Why community ownership? Understanding land reform in Scotland , 2013 .

[12]  James A. Robinson,et al.  The Political Value of Land: Political Reform and Land Prices in Chile , 2012 .

[13]  C. Lund Fragmented sovereignty: land reform and dispossession in Laos , 2011 .

[14]  Lezzane Rungasamy The need for settlement support in land reform projects : focus on sustainable development , 2011 .

[15]  S. So,et al.  Land Rights in Cambodia: How Neopatrimonial Politics Restricts Land Policy Reform , 2011 .

[16]  E. Bouquet State-led land reform and local institutional change: Land titles, land markets and tenure security in Mexican Communities , 2009 .

[17]  P. Laris,et al.  Hobby Ranching and Chile's Land‐reform Legacy* , 2008 .

[18]  Noer Fauzi Rachman The Resurgence of Land Reform Policy and Agrarian Movements in Indonesia , 2011 .

[19]  F. Thiel Donor-driven land reform in Cambodia - property rights, planning, and land value taxation. , 2010 .