Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P =.008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

[1]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[2]  P. Fumoleau,et al.  Docetaxel: a new active agent in the therapy of metastatic breast cancer. , 1997, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[3]  M. Trudeau Docetaxel (Taxotere): an overview of first-line monotherapy. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[4]  A. Oosterom,et al.  Docetaxel (Taxotere): an effective agent in the management of second-line breast cancer. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[5]  R. Blamey,et al.  Continuous chemotherapy in responsive metastatic breast cancer: a role for tumour markers? , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  V. Harvey,et al.  A randomized comparison of single-agent doxorubicin and epirubicin as first-line cytotoxic therapy in advanced breast cancer. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  C. Spurr,et al.  Interrupted versus continuous chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Piedmont Oncology Association. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Schaid,et al.  Randomized Trial of Doxorubicin Alone or Combined with Vincristine and Mitomycin C in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer , 1989, American journal of clinical oncology.

[10]  I. Henderson,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  A Comparative Study of Doxorubicin and Epirubicin in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer , 1989, American journal of clinical oncology.

[12]  M. Tattersall,et al.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Rubens,et al.  A comparison of two doses of adriamycin in the primary chemotherapy of disseminated breast carcinoma. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  P. Sager,et al.  Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction complicating doxorubicin therapy. Seven-year experience using serial radionuclide angiocardiography. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. , 1986, Biometrics.

[16]  D. Gochnour,et al.  A comparison of mitoxantrone and doxorubicin in breast cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  S. George,et al.  Combination chemotherapy and adriamycin in patients with advanced breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study , 1976, Cancer.

[19]  J. Pitha,et al.  A clinicopathologic analysis of adriamycin cardiotoxicity , 1973, Cancer.

[20]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies , 1995 .

[21]  M D Schluchter,et al.  Methods for the analysis of informatively censored longitudinal data. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  S. Green,et al.  VP-16 + adriamycin vs. adriamycin alone in advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast, phase II, a randomized trial: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. , 1988, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[23]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.