Intubating conditions and neuromuscular effects of mivacurium during propofol‐alfentanil anaesthesia

In three groups of 20 patients, anaesthetized with propofol and alfentanil, tracheal intubation conditions and the onset of neuromuscular blockade after administration of three different doses of mivacurium chloride (0.11, 0.15, and 0.19 mg/kg=1.5×ED95 2.×ED95, and 2.5×ED95) were assessed. Intubation conditions were found to be clinically acceptable (good or excellent) in 83% of patients. Eighty‐two per cent of patients were successfully intubated on the first attempt after 60–90 s. No difference in intubation scores or number of intubation attempts among the three dosage groups were found. We conclude that mivacurium chloride allows smooth intubation in most patients within 60 90 s, even with the lowest dose (0.11 mg/kg), after a propofol‐alfentanil induction of anaesthesia. However, because there were a few patients in whom intubating conditions were inadequate at 60–90 s, we are reluctant to advocate the preference of mivacurium chloride over suxamethonium for rapid sequence induction in emergency situations.

[1]  R. Mirakhur,et al.  Neuromuscular effects and intubating conditions following mivacurium: a comparison with suxamethonium , 1993, Anaesthesia.

[2]  A. R. Cooper,et al.  Myalgia and biochemical changes following suxamethonium after induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol , 1993, Anaesthesia.

[3]  T. Heier,et al.  Comparison of the neuromuscular block induced by mivacurium, suxamethonium or atracurium during nitrous oxide-fentanyl anaesthesia. , 1989, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  C. Shanks,et al.  Mivacurium-induced neuromuscular blockade following single bolus doses and with continuous infusion during either balanced or enflurane anesthesia. , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[5]  J. Seltzer,et al.  Comparison of Tracheal Intubating Conditions and Neuromuscular Blocking Profiles after Intubating Doses of Mivacurium Chloride or Succinylcholine in Surgical Outpatients , 1989, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  D. R. Cook,et al.  Comparison of mivacurium and suxamethonium administered by bolus and infusion. , 1989, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  T. Heier,et al.  The dose-response relationship of mivacurium chloride in humans during nitrous oxide-fentanyl or nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[8]  J. Weakly,et al.  TRACHEAL INTUBATION AT TWO MINUTES WITH MIVACURIUM CHLORIDE, 0.15 ug/kg and 0.25 ug/kg , 1988 .

[9]  P. White,et al.  COMPARISON OF HIVACURIUH (B 1090U) AND SUCCINYLCHOLINE DURING OUTPATIENT LAPAROSCOPY , 1988 .

[10]  M. Goldberg Anesthesia for Thoracic Procedures , 1988 .

[11]  R. Katz,et al.  EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MIVACURIUM CHLORIDE (B\V B1090U) FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN SURGICAL PATIENTS DURING N20/O2/NARCOTIC ANESTHESIA , 1988 .

[12]  J. Dundee,et al.  The effects of thiopentone and propofol on upper airway integrity , 1988, Anaesthesia.

[13]  D. R. Cook,et al.  Mivacurium Chloride (BW B1090U)‐Induced Neuromuscular Blockade During Nitrous Oxide–Isoflurane and Nitrous Oxide—Narcotic Anesthesia in Adult Surgical Patients , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  H. H. Ali,et al.  The Clinical Neuromuscular Pharmacology of Mivacurium Chloride (BW B1090U). A Short‐acting Nondepolarizing Ester Neuromuscular Blocking Drug , 1988, Anesthesiology.

[15]  J. Seltzer,et al.  A COMPARISON OF ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION CONDITIONS AND RECOVERY FOLLOWING INTUBATING DOSES OF MIVACURIUM CHLORIDE OR SUCCINYLOHOLINE IN OUTPATIENT SURGERY , 1988 .

[16]  D. Murray,et al.  NEUROMUSCULAR EFFECTS OF BW B1090U DURING NARCOTIC NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA , 1987 .

[17]  Martin S. Mok,et al.  KETAMINE ENHANCES VECURONIUM-INDUCED NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK , 1986 .

[18]  J. Weakly,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF BW B1090U AND SUCCINYLCHOLINE ADMINISTERED BY BOLUS AND INFUSION IN ANESTHETIZED PATIENTS , 1986 .

[19]  M. VandeWetering,et al.  Lack of effects of emulsified propofol ('Diprivan') on vecuronium pharmacodynamics--preliminary results in man. , 1985 .

[20]  J. van Egmond,et al.  Lack of effects of emulsified propofol ('Diprivan') on vecuronium pharmacodynamics--preliminary results in man. , 1985, Postgraduate medical journal.

[21]  N. Krieg,et al.  Incubation Conditions and Reversibility of a New Non‐Depolarizing Neurornuscular Blocking Agent, Org‐NC45 , 1980, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.