A method for accurate in silico modeling of ultrasound transducer arrays.

This paper presents a new approach to improve the in silico modeling of ultrasound transducer arrays. While current simulation tools accurately predict the theoretical element spatio-temporal pressure response, transducers do not always behave as theorized. In practice, using the probe's physical dimensions and published specifications in silico, often results in unsatisfactory agreement between simulation and experiment. We describe a general optimization procedure used to maximize the correlation between the observed and simulated spatio-temporal response of a pulsed single element in a commercial ultrasound probe. A linear systems approach is employed to model element angular sensitivity, lens effects, and diffraction phenomena. A numerical deconvolution method is described to characterize the intrinsic electro-mechanical impulse response of the element. Once the response of the element and optimal element characteristics are known, prediction of the pressure response for arbitrary apertures and excitation signals is performed through direct convolution using available tools. We achieve a correlation of 0.846 between the experimental emitted waveform and simulated waveform when using the probe's physical specifications in silico. A far superior correlation of 0.988 is achieved when using the optimized in silico model. Electronic noise appears to be the main effect preventing the realization of higher correlation coefficients. More accurate in silico modeling will improve the evaluation and design of ultrasound transducers as well as aid in the development of sophisticated beamforming strategies.

[1]  Gerald R. Harris,et al.  Transient field of a baffled planar piston having an arbitrary vibration amplitude distribution , 1981 .

[2]  T Boutkedjirt,et al.  Reconstruction of ultrasonic fields by deconvolving the hydrophone aperture effects. I. Theory and simulation. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[3]  R. Krimholtz,et al.  New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers , 1970 .

[4]  S W Smith,et al.  Angular response of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones. , 1982, Medical physics.

[5]  Sheng-Wen Huang,et al.  Inducing and Imaging Thermal Strain Using a Single Ultrasound Linear Array , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  G.R. Harris,et al.  Hydrophone measurements in diagnostic ultrasound fields , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  K. Ranganathan,et al.  A novel beamformer design method for medical ultrasound. Part I: Theory , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Shefeng Yan,et al.  Optimal array pattern synthesis for broadband arrays. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Peter R. Stepanishen,et al.  Experimental verification of the impulse response method to evaluate transient acoustic fields , 1981 .

[10]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  J. Hossack,et al.  Improving the characteristics of a transducer using multiple piezoelectric layers , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  N de Jong,et al.  A KLM-circuit model of a multi-layer transducer for acoustic bladder volume measurements. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[13]  W.F. Walker,et al.  A spline-based approach for computing spatial impulse responses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  William F. Walker,et al.  Significance of correlation in ultrasound signal processing , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  P. Stepanishen Transient Radiation from Pistons in an Infinite Planar Baffle , 1970 .

[16]  Daniel Guyomar,et al.  Transient fields radiated by curved surfaces—Application to focusing , 1984 .

[17]  K. B. Ocheltree,et al.  Sound field calculation for rectangular sources , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Gerald R. Harris,et al.  Review of transient field theory for a baffled planar piston , 1981 .

[19]  Franck Levassort,et al.  Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model. , 2007, Ultrasonics.

[20]  Dominique Certon,et al.  1D ultrasound array: performance evaluation and characterization by laser interferometry , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[21]  M Fatemi,et al.  Ultrasonic B-scan imaging: theory of image formation and a technique for restoration. , 1980, Ultrasonic imaging.

[22]  Yibin Zheng,et al.  Novel transmit aperture for very large depth of focus in medical ultrasound B-scan , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Time deconvolution of diffraction effects ― application to calibration and prediction of transducer waveforms , 1988 .

[24]  Francesco Viola,et al.  Time-Domain Optimized Near-Field Estimator for Ultrasound Imaging: Initial Development and Results , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Jie Liu,et al.  Efficient array beam forming by spatial filtering for ultrasound B-mode imaging. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Tadeusz Stepinski,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging using sources with finite aperture: deconvolution of the spatial impulse response. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B. Piwakowski,et al.  A new approach to calculate the field radiated from arbitrarily structured transducer arrays , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  J A Jensen,et al.  Deconvolution of Ultrasound Images , 1992, Ultrasonic imaging.

[29]  Gordon S. Kino,et al.  A theory for the radiation pattern of a narrow‐strip acoustic transducer , 1980 .