Survey of embryonic stem cell line source strains in the water maze reveals superior reversal learning of 129S6/SvEvTac mice

The availability of pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells for gene targeting has resulted in laboratory mice becoming important animal models of human neurological disease. Inbred strains of mice differ in many behavioural phenotypes, such that the same gene mutation can appear to have different phenotypic effects when introduced onto different genetic backgrounds. Prior knowledge of the behavioural phenotypes of the inbred strains used for gene targeting would, therefore, allow the selection of the most appropriate genetic background for the hypothesis to be tested. With this in mind, we tested eight strains of mice (129S1/SvImJ, 129S2/SvPasIcoCrlBR, 129S6/SvEvTac, B6129SF1/J, C57BL/6J, C57BL/6N, LP/J and SM/J), including the sources of five ES cell lines commonly used for gene targeting, in the spatial (submerged platform) version of the Morris water maze, the most widely used paradigm to evaluate the cognitive abilities of genetically modified mice. The three 129 substrain sources of ES cell lines demonstrated spatial learning in the water maze that was superior to that of C57BL/6J, the inbred strain most commonly used for the maintenance and phenotypic testing of mutations. In addition, 129S6/SvEvTac was unique amongst the eight strains tested in having a particular capacity for reversal learning, when the submerged platform was relocated to the opposite quadrant. We conclude that some substrains of 129 could provide suitable genetic backgrounds for testing gene mutations that might be expected to impair cognitive function, thus negating the need to backcross to C57BL/6J, thereby avoiding the so-called "flanking gene problem".

[1]  P. Roubertoux,et al.  Loss of Aggression, After Transfer onto a C57BL/6J Background, in Mice Carrying a Targeted Disruption of the Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene , 2000, Behavior genetics.

[2]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Perseveration on place reversals in spatial swimming pool tasks: Further evidence for place learning in hippocampal rats , 1997, Hippocampus.

[3]  K. Klapdor,et al.  The Morris Water-Escape Task in Mice: Strain Differences and Effects of Intra-Maze Contrast and Brightness , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  J. Barnes,et al.  Behavioural analysis and susceptibility to CNS injury of four inbred strains of mice , 1999, Brain Research.

[5]  Florian Holsboer,et al.  Behavioural performance in three substrains of mouse strain 129 , 1997, Brain Research.

[6]  G. Lynch,et al.  Memory: Organization and locus of change , 1994 .

[7]  H. Anisman,et al.  Stress-induced disturbances in Morris water-maze performance: Interstrain variability , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  R. Gerlai Gene targeting: technical confounds and potential solutions in behavioral brain research , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  H. L. Petri,et al.  Dissociation of Hippocampal and Striatal Contributions to Spatial Navigation in the Water Maze , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[10]  Douglas Wahlsten,et al.  Behavioural testing of standard inbred and 5HT1B knockout mice: implications of absent corpus callosum , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  D. Creel Inappropriate use of albino animals as models in research , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[12]  G. Keller,et al.  Multiple hematopoietic lineages develop from embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture. , 1991, Development.

[13]  H. Lipp,et al.  Dissecting the Behaviour of Transgenic Mice: Is it the Mutation, the Genetic Background, or the Environment? , 2000, Experimental physiology.

[14]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Formation of a place learning-set by the rat: A new paradigm for neurobehavioral studies , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  R. D'Hooge,et al.  Mildly impaired water maze performance in maleFmr1 knockout mice , 1997, Neuroscience.

[16]  Hee-Sup Shin,et al.  Mutant Mice and Neuroscience: Recommendations Concerning Genetic Background , 1997, Neuron.

[17]  H. Lipp,et al.  Similar target, different effects: late-onset ataxia and spatial learning in prion protein-deficient mouse lines , 2001, Neurogenetics.

[18]  R. Leahy,et al.  Finding new candidate genes for learning and memory , 2002, Journal of neuroscience research.

[19]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[20]  J. Sedgwick,et al.  Gene targeting in C57BL/6 ES cells. Successful germ line transmission using recipient BALB/c blastocysts developmentally matured in vitro. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  J. Roder,et al.  Overexpression of a calcium-binding protein, S100 beta, in astrocytes alters synaptic plasticity and impairs spatial learning in transgenic mice. , 1995, Learning & memory.

[22]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The hippocampus--what does it do? , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[23]  R. Gerlai Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype? , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  Importance of strain differences in evaluations of learning and memory processes in null mutants , 1996 .

[25]  A. Gossler,et al.  Use of coisogenic host blastocysts for efficient establishment of germline chimeras with C57BL/6J ES cell lines. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[26]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  Impaired spatial learning in alpha-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice. , 1992, Science.

[27]  X. Estivill,et al.  Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[28]  Mathieu Wolff,et al.  Differential learning abilities of 129T2/Sv and C57BL/6J mice as assessed in three water maze protocols , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  J. Crawley,et al.  Inbred strain differences in prepulse inhibition of the mouse startle response , 1997, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  V. Bolivar,et al.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci with knockout/congenic strains. , 2001, Genome research.

[31]  B. Ledermann,et al.  Establishment of a germ-line competent C57BL/6 embryonic stem cell line. , 1991, Experimental cell research.

[32]  R. Paylor,et al.  Hippocampal lesions cause learning deficits in inbred mice in the Morris water maze and conditioned-fear task. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[33]  M Puopolo,et al.  Behavioural effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on laboratory rodents: statistical methodologies and an application concerning developmental PCB exposure. , 1999, Chemosphere.

[34]  R. Morris Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  E. Olfert,et al.  Guide to the care and use of experimental animals , 1993 .

[36]  T. Gould,et al.  Genetic influences on latent inhibition. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  Lorraine Flaherty,et al.  Behavioral differences among 129 substrains: implications for knockout and transgenic mice. , 2002 .

[38]  Muriel T. Davisson,et al.  Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[39]  J. Crawley Unusual behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[40]  Allan Collins,et al.  Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies , 1997, Psychopharmacology.

[41]  S. Kõks,et al.  Strain and gender differences in the behavior of mouse lines commonly used in transgenic studies , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[42]  E. Kandel,et al.  Impaired long-term potentiation, spatial learning, and hippocampal development in fyn mutant mice. , 1992, Science.

[43]  Peter Li,et al.  The Celera Discovery SystemTM , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  J. Wehner,et al.  Hippocampal protein kinase C activity is reduced in poor spatial learners , 1990, Brain Research.

[45]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Altered performance characteristics in cognitive tasks: comparison of the albino ICR and CD1 mouse strains , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[46]  S. Floresco,et al.  Targeted disruption of the Huntington's disease gene results in embryonic lethality and behavioral and morphological changes in heterozygotes , 1995, Cell.

[47]  R. Lathe Mice, gene targeting and behaviour: more than just genetic background , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[48]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Genetic variation among 129 substrains: practical consequences. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[49]  Victor H. Denenberg,et al.  A behavioral and neuroanatomical assessment of an inbred substrain of 129 mice with behavioral comparisons to C57BL/6J mice , 1999, Brain Research.

[50]  E. Kandel,et al.  Strain-dependent differences in LTP and hippocampus-dependent memory in inbred mice. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[51]  David P. Wolfer,et al.  Spatial Memory and Learning in Transgenic Mice: Fact or Artifact? , 1998, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[52]  Wim E Crusio,et al.  Knockout mice: simple solutions to the problems of genetic background and flanking genes , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[53]  R J Sutherland,et al.  Being there: a novel demonstration of latent spatial learning in the rat. , 1982, Behavioral and neural biology.

[54]  David M. Bannerman,et al.  Faster is not surer—a comparison of C57BL/6J and 129S2/Sv mouse strains in the watermaze , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[55]  J. Wehner,et al.  Assessment of locomotor activity, acoustic and tactile startle, and prepulse inhibition of startle in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: Implications of genetic background for single gene and quantitative trait loci analyses , 1997, Neuroscience.

[56]  J. Wehner,et al.  Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses , 1997, Neuroscience.

[57]  H. Bluethmann,et al.  Targeted disruption of the MHC class II Aa gene in C57BL/6 mice. , 1993, International immunology.

[58]  A. Holmes,et al.  Behavioral profiles of inbred strains on novel olfactory, spatial and emotional tests for reference memory in mice , 2002, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[59]  J. Sahel,et al.  The implications of rod-dependent cone survival for basic and clinical research. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[60]  D. Wolfer,et al.  Enriched early experiences of mice underexpressing the β‐amyloid precursor protein restore spatial learning capabilities but not normal openfield behavior of adult animals , 2002, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[61]  A. Joyner,et al.  Establishment and chimera analysis of 129/SvEv- and C57BL/6-derived mouse embryonic stem cell lines. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[62]  K. Okazaki,et al.  Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. , 1994, The International journal of developmental biology.

[63]  David P Wolfer,et al.  Genetically modified mice and cognition , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[64]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  A comparison of rats and mice in a swimming pool place task and matching to place task: Some surprising differences , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[65]  Jim J. Hagan,et al.  Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[66]  E. Simpson,et al.  Revised nomenclature for strain 129 mice , 1999, Mammalian Genome.

[67]  D. Wahlsten Deficiency of corpus callosum varies with strain and supplier of the mice , 1982, Brain Research.

[68]  J. Wehner,et al.  Differences between inbred strains of mice in Morris water maze performance , 1988, Behavior genetics.

[69]  W. Frankel,et al.  Of Mice and Genome Sequence , 2001, Cell.

[70]  David P Wolfer,et al.  Assessing the effects of the 129/Sv genetic background on swimming navigation learning in transgenic mutants: a study using mice with a modified β-amyloid precursor protein gene , 1997, Brain Research.