Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli

Ss classified as quickly as possible stimuli back-projected one at a time on a small screen by pressing one of two levers in response to each stimulus, according to the levels of a single specified binary stimulus dimension. Stimuli were rectangles varying in height alone, in width alone, or in both dimensions, in either a correlated or an orthogonal fashion. Stimuli followed responses by a fixed interval of 82, 580, or 1,080 msec. Response time was longer when both dimensions varied orthogonally than when only one dimension varied, indicating that Ss were unable to avoid perceiving the rectangle figures as wholes. Repeated stimuli were responded to more quickly than stimuli which were different from the immediately preceding stimulus in all conditions. With orthogonally combined dimensions, response time to stimulus repetitions was lowest, increased when the stimulus changed while the response was repeated, and increased still further when both the stimulus and the response changed. Increasing the time interval between stimuli decreased response time for nonrepetitions, while response time for repetitions was relatively unaffected. The results were discussed in terms of two models of serial choice reaction time.

[1]  P. Bertelson.  S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task , 1963 .

[2]  William G. Chase,et al.  Stimulus and response repetition effects in retrieval from short-term memory. Trace decay and memory search , 1973 .

[3]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Effects of focusing strategy on speeded classification with grouping, filtering, and condensation tasks , 1972 .

[4]  S Kornblum,et al.  Serial-Choice Reaction Time: Inadequacies of the Information Hypothesis , 1968, Science.

[5]  R. Hyman,et al.  The information hypothesis and non-repetitions , 1969 .

[6]  D. Bindra,et al.  Common features of the “repetition” and “same-different” effects in reaction time experiments , 1970 .

[7]  W. Eichelman,et al.  Stimulus and response repetition effects for naming letters at two response-stimulus intervals , 1970 .

[8]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Speed of discrimination with redundant stimulus attributes , 1969 .

[9]  R. Hyman.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Williams,et al.  Sequential effects in disjunctive reaction time: implications for decision models. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  M. Doherty.  Information and discriminability as determinants of absolute judgment choice reaction time , 1968 .

[12]  W. Chase,et al.  Sequential effects in choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[13]  D. Hale.  Sequential Effects in a Two-Choice Serial Reaction Task , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  M C Smith,et al.  Repetition effect and short-term memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Stephen Engel,et al.  Alternation and repetition reaction times under three schedules of event sequencing , 1967 .

[16]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval , 1966 .

[17]  P. Bertelson.  Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding Task , 1961 .

[18]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .