Simulation of Multistage Compressor at Off-Design Conditions

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used for compressor design, yet the prediction of performance and stage matching for multistage, high-speed machines remains challenging. This paper presents the authors' effort to improve the reliability of CFD in multistage compressor simulations. The endwall features (e.g., blade filet and shape of the platform edge) are meshed with minimal approximations. Turbulence models with linear and nonlinear eddy viscosity models are assessed. The nonlinear eddy viscosity model predicts a higher production of turbulent kinetic energy in the passages, especially close to the endwall region. This results in a more accurate prediction of the choked mass flow and the shape of total pressure profiles close to the hub. The nonlinear viscosity model generally shows an improvement on its linear counterparts based on the comparisons with the rig data. For geometrical details, truncated filet leads to thicker boundary layer on the filet and reduced mass flow and efficiency. Shroud cavities are found to be essential to predict the right blockage and the flow details close to the hub. At the part speed, the computations without the shroud cavities fail to predict the major flow features in the passage, and this leads to inaccurate predictions of mass flow and shapes of the compressor characteristic. The paper demonstrates that an accurate representation of the endwall geometry and an effective turbulence model, together with a good quality and sufficiently refined grid, result in a credible prediction of compressor matching and performance with steady-state mixing planes.

[1]  William N. Dawes,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery design , 1998 .

[2]  Luca di Mare,et al.  Hybrid meshing using constrained Delaunay triangulation for viscous flow simulations , 2016 .

[3]  J. J. Adamczyk,et al.  The Effect of Hub Leakage Flow on Two High Speed Axial Flow Compressor Rotors , 1997 .

[4]  John D. Denton,et al.  Some Limitations of Turbomachinery CFD , 2010 .

[5]  Luca di Mare,et al.  Low Frequency Distortion in Civil Aero-engine Intake , 2016 .

[6]  Theodore H. Okiishi,et al.  Modeling Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows in Axial-Flow Compressors , 2000 .

[7]  Gan Lu,et al.  VIRTUAL GAS TURBINE: PRE-PROCESSING AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS , 2016 .

[8]  Luca di Mare,et al.  Modern multicore and manycore architectures: Modelling, optimisation and benchmarking a multiblock CFD code , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[9]  D. Wilcox Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[10]  Luca di Mare,et al.  Virtual Gas Turbines: Geometry and Conceptual Description , 2011 .

[11]  Nicholas A. Cumpsty Some Lessons Learned , 2010 .

[12]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[13]  Theodore H. Okiishi,et al.  The Influence of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Compressor Performance , 1999 .

[14]  Nicholas A. Cumpsty,et al.  The Use of Sweep and Dihedral in Multistage Axial Flow Compressor Blading—Part I: University Research and Methods Development , 2002 .

[15]  L. di Mare,et al.  Lip Stall Suppression in Powered Intakes , 2016 .

[16]  Luca di Mare,et al.  Mesh Generation for Turbomachinery Blade Passages with Three-Dimensional Endwall Features , 2017 .

[17]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models for Anisotropic Wall-Bounded Flows , 2012 .

[18]  Leigh Lapworth,et al.  PADRAM: Parametric Design and Rapid Meshing System for Turbomachinery Optimisation , 2003 .

[19]  J. D. Denton,et al.  The Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines , 1992 .