Neural Mechanisms of Tactual form and Texture Perception

In the last decade or so, there has been rapid movement toward the use of more complex stimuli in the study of perceptual function related to the hand. This review has focused on the neural mechanisms of form and texture perception. Evidence from neurophysiological and psychophysical studies in which static touch, scanning touch, and the Optacon were used indicate that the spatial acuity of the RA system may be as much as three times poorer than the SAI system, evidence that suggests that form perception is dominated by the SAI system. Pattern recognition behavior in a tactual letter recognition task appears to be directly related to the response properties of SAI afferent fibers. Psychophysical studies of roughness perception show that roughness magnitude is related to surface structure in an orderly manner. Because roughness varies along an intensive continuum, mean impulse rate in one or more of the afferent systems is the most obvious coding possibility. No satisfactory relationship between mean impulse rate and roughness has been observed, however. The strongest hypothesis is that tactual roughness perception is based on spatial variation in the SAI population response. The combined evidence from studies reviewed here suggests complementary roles for each of the afferent systems, which are presented as working hypotheses: The SAI system is the primary spatial system and is responsible for tactual form and roughness perception when the fingers contact a surface directly and for the perception of external events through the distribution of forces across the skin surface. The PC system is responsible for the perception of external events that are manifested through transmitted high-frequency vibrations of the kind that are critical in the use of objects as tools. The RA system is responsible for the detection and representation of localized movement between skin and a surface as well as for surface form and texture when surface variation is too small to activate the SAI afferents effectively.

[1]  M. Zigler,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Perceptions Roughness and Smoothness , 1923 .

[2]  E D Adrian,et al.  The impulse discharge from the pacinian corpuscle , 1929, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  THE RELATION OF THALAMIC CELL RESPONSE TO PERIPHERAL STIMULI VARIED OVER AN INTENSIVE CONTINUUM. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  G. Ekman,et al.  ROUGHNESS, SMOOTHNESS, AND PREFERENCE: A STUDY OF QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS IN INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  L. A. Stone Subjective roughness and smoothness for individual judges , 1967 .

[6]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J E Hind,et al.  Time structure of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey in response to complex periodic sounds. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  James C. Bliss A Relatively High-Resolution Reading Aid for the Blind , 1969 .

[9]  C. Y. Nolan,et al.  Perceptual Factors in Braille Word Recognition. (American Foundation for the Blind. Research Series No. 20). , 1969 .

[10]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Lederman Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure , 1974 .

[13]  Mountcastle Vb,et al.  The view from within: pathways to the study of perception. , 1975, The Johns Hopkins medical journal.

[14]  Perceived roughness of amplitude-modulated tones and noise. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Texture perceived with the fingers , 1977 .

[16]  Charles J. Vierck Comparisons of punctate, edge and surface stimulation of peripheral, slowly-adapting, cutaneous, afferent units of cats , 1979, Brain Research.

[17]  James C. Craig,et al.  A Confusion matrix for tactually presented letters , 1979 .

[18]  S J Lederman,et al.  The effect of skin temperature on the perception of roughness. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[19]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Y Inukai,et al.  A Vector Model Analysis of Individual Differences in Sensory Measurement of Surface Roughness , 1980, Human factors.

[21]  R. Johansson,et al.  Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1980, Brain Research.

[22]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Peripheral neural representation of spatial dimensions of a textured surface moving across the monkey's finger pad. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  K O Johnson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille‐like dot patterns in the monkey. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Loomis On the tangibility of letters and braille , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J M Loomis,et al.  Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile detection thresholds for a single asperity on an otherwise smooth surface. , 1983, Somatosensory research.

[29]  Johnson Ko Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture discrimination. , 1983 .

[30]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Tactile recognition of raised characters: A parametric study , 1985 .

[31]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Tactile detection of a dot on a smooth surface: peripheral neural events. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: effects of hand position on segmental speech perception. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Perceived roughness of a grating: correlation with responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the monkey's fingerpad , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  B Hughes,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatiotemporal events: evidence from an unfamiliar modality. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  R. Romo,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  E P Gardner,et al.  Simulation of motion on the skin. III. Mechanisms used by rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the primate hand for spatiotemporal resolution and two-point discrimination. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  J M Loomis,et al.  A model of character recognition and legibility. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  C. Connor,et al.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  John Phillips,et al.  Tactile Pattern Recognition , 1991 .

[42]  Ove Franzén,et al.  Information Processing in the Somatosensory System , 1991 .