Efficient Finite Element Analysis/Computational Fluid Dynamics Thermal Coupling for Engineering Applications

An efficient finite element analysis/computational fluid dynamics (FEA/CFD) thermal coupling technique has been developed and demonstrated. The thermal coupling is achieved by an iterative procedure between FEA and CFD calculations. Communication between FEA and CFD calculations ensures continuity of temperature and heat flux. In the procedure, the FEA simulation is treated as unsteady for a given transient cycle. To speed up the thermal coupling, steady CFD calculations are employed, considering that fluid flow time scales are much shorter than those for the solid heat conduction and therefore the influence of unsteadiness in fluid regions is negligible. To facilitate the thermal coupling, the procedure is designed to allow a set of CFD models to be defined at key time points/intervals in the transient cycle and to be invoked during the coupling process at specified time points. To further enhance computational efficiency, a “frozen flow” or “energy equation only” coupling option was also developed, where only the energy equation is solved, while the flow is frozen in CFD simulation during the thermal coupling process for specified time intervals. This option has proven very useful in practice, as the flow is found to be unaffected by the thermal boundary conditions over certain time intervals. The FEA solver employed is an in-house code, and the coupling has been implemented for two different CFD solvers: a commercial code and an in-house code. Test cases include an industrial low pressure (LP) turbine and a high pressure (HP) compressor, with CFD modeling of the LP turbine disk cavity and the HP compressor drive cone cavity flows, respectively. Good agreement of wall temperatures with the industrial rig test data was observed. It is shown that the coupled solutions can be obtained in sufficiently short turn-around times (typically within a week) for use in design.

[1]  H. Krain,et al.  Coupling of 3D-Navier-Stokes External Flow Calculations and Internal 3D-Heat-Conduction Calculations for Cooled Turbine Blades , 1992 .

[2]  Karsten Kusterer,et al.  Conjugate Calculations for a Film-Cooled Blade Under Different Operating Conditions , 2004 .

[3]  Nicholas J. Hills,et al.  CFD for Turbomachinery Internal Air Systems , 2006 .

[4]  John W Chew,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery internal air systems , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  Jing Ren,et al.  Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for Film Cooling Configurations With Different Hole Geometries , 2003 .

[6]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis of Internally Cooled Configurations , 2001 .

[7]  Alexander V. Mirzamoghadam,et al.  Flow and Heat Transfer in an Industrial Rotor-Stator Rim Sealing Cavity , 2002 .

[8]  Alain J. Kassab,et al.  A coupled FVM/BEM approach to conjugate heat transfer in turbine blades , 1994 .

[9]  Nicholas J. Hills,et al.  Achieving high parallel performance for an unstructured unsteady turbomachinery CFD code , 2007, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[10]  N. J. Hills,et al.  Coupled Fluid/Solid Heat Transfer Computation for Turbine Discs , 2001 .

[11]  Yoji Okita.  Transient Thermal and Flow Field in a Turbine Disk Rotor-Stator System , 2006 .

[12]  K. Saunders,et al.  The Use of CFD to Generate Heat Transfer Boundary Conditions for a Rotor-Stator Cavity in a Compressor Drum Thermal Model , 2007 .

[13]  Yoji Okita,et al.  Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis of Turbine Rotor-Stator System , 2002 .

[14]  Nicholas J. Hills,et al.  3D Fluid–Solid Heat Transfer Coupling of an Aero Engine Pre-Swirl System , 2005 .

[15]  Leo V. Lewis,et al.  A Non-Coupled CFD-FE Procedure to Evaluate Windage and Heat Transfer in Rotor-Stator Cavities , 2004 .