The Control of Sequential Aiming Movements: The Influence of Practice and Manual Asymmetries On the One-Target Advantage

[1]  Ann Lavrysen,et al.  The one-target advantage: advanced preparation or online processing? , 2002, Motor control.

[2]  D Elliott,et al.  The one-target advantage: a test of the movement integration hypothesis. , 2001, Human movement science.

[3]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Goal-Directed Movements , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  W. Helsen,et al.  Vision and Laterality: Does Occlusion Disclose a Feedback Processing Advantage for the Right Hand System? , 2000, Cortex.

[6]  W. Helsen,et al.  Coupling of Eye, Finger, Elbow, and Shoulder Movements During Manual Aiming , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  James L. Lyons,et al.  The utilization of visual information in the control of rapid sequential aiming movements. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Dual-task interference as an indicator of on-line programming in simple movement sequences , 1999 .

[9]  Matthew Heath,et al.  The control of goal-directed limb movements: Correcting errors in the trajectory , 1999 .

[10]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Manual Asymmetries and Saccadic Eye Movements in Right-Handers During Single and Reciprocal Aiming Movements , 1998, Cortex.

[11]  Michael A. Khan,et al.  The Effect of Practice on the Control of Rapid Aiming Movements: Evidence for an Interdependency between Programming and Feedback Processing , 1998 .

[12]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  On-line programming of simple movement sequences , 1997 .

[13]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance , 1996 .

[14]  W. Verwey.  BUFFER LOADING AND CHUNKING IN SEQUENTIAL KEYPRESSING , 1996 .

[15]  C J Worringham,et al.  Distribution of Programming in a Rapid Aimed Sequential Movement , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. , 1995 .

[17]  D. Elliott,et al.  The Preparation of Aiming Movements , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  Jos J. Adam,et al.  The control of two-element, reciprocal aiming movements: Evidence for chunking , 1995 .

[19]  D Elliott,et al.  Optimizing the use of Vision in Manual Aiming: The Role of Practice , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[21]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  T. Carr,et al.  Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. , 1989 .

[23]  C J Chamberlin,et al.  Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[24]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  C. Dugas,et al.  On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training , 1987 .

[26]  Robert W. Christina,et al.  Simple Reaction Time as a Function of Response Complexity: Christina et al. (1982) Revisited. , 1985 .

[27]  D Elliott,et al.  Manual asymmetries in the performance of sequential movement by adolescents and adults with Down syndrome. , 1985, American journal of mental deficiency.

[28]  M G Fischman,et al.  Programming time as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  M G Fischman,et al.  Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: memory drum theory revisited. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Left-Hemisphere Motor Dominance in Righthandersi , 1980, Cortex.

[31]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[32]  M. Bryden.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[34]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  I. Franks,et al.  The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: evidence from latency, kinematic, and EMG measures , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  C. J. Winstein,et al.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  W. Helsen,et al.  The one-target advantage in the control of rapid aiming movements: - the effect of practice , 2001 .

[38]  R Huys,et al.  Control of rapid aimed hand movements: the one-target advantage. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  D Elliott,et al.  The control of sequential goal-directed movement: learning to use feedback or central planning? , 1998, Motor control.

[40]  Doreen Kimura,et al.  Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication , 1993 .

[41]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Effect of unimanual training on contralateral motor overflow in children and adults , 1987 .

[42]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[43]  G. Stelmach.  Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[44]  M G Fischman,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Motor Behavior Influence of Extended Practice on Programming Time, Movement Time, and Transfer in Simple Target-striking Responses , 2022 .