Social action as the control of affect

When defining their immediate situations, people characterize themselves and others by social identities like doctor and patient, evoking sentiments that serve as guidelines for interpreting and creating events in the given situation. In particular, the assigned identities recall notions of how good, how powerful, and how lively each person is fundamentally. When events deflect feelings away from these sentiments, new events are conceived and ordinarily implemented to move feelings back toward the fundamental values. Thus, theoretically, social behavior and transient feelings form a control system with fundamental sentiments as reference signals. Interpersonal conflicts sometimes lead to events that a person cannot comprehend as sentiment confirming. This invokes redefinitions of situations, a higher order control that changes reference signals. Empirically derived formulas describing affective reactions to events have been elaborated into a mathematical model representing all of these processes. Data on a large number of social identities and behaviors have been collected to permit simulations using the model. Illustrations show that this theory of social action permits concrete, plausible analyses of social interactions, role relationships, and social reactions to deviance. Simulations of group dynamics in organizational contexts conceivably could provide guidelines for changing group functioning and for establishing social structures without historical precedent.

[1]  H. F. Gollob Some tests of a social inference model. , 1974 .

[2]  D. R. Heise Potency dynamics in simple sentences. , 1970 .

[3]  Murray S. Miron,et al.  Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning , 1975 .

[4]  D. R. Heise Affectual dynamics in simple sentences. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Osgood Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. , 1962 .

[6]  Peter Mchugh,et al.  The Social Ascription of Motives , 1971 .

[7]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action. , 1974 .

[8]  D. R. Heise Norms and Individual Patterns in Student Deviancy , 1968 .

[9]  W. Capel Continuities and discontinuities in attitudes of the same persons measured through time. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.

[10]  E. L. Kelly Consistency of the adult personality. , 1955 .

[11]  H. F. Gollob Impression formation and word combination in sentences. , 1968 .

[12]  Gary H. Tiedeman,et al.  The creation of deviance : interpersonal and organizational determinants , 1977 .

[13]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[14]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. , 1959 .

[15]  H. F. Gollob,et al.  Judgments of an actor's Power and ability to influence others , 1973 .

[16]  N. Anderson,et al.  New light on order effects in attitude change. , 1973 .

[17]  C. Osgood Interpersonal verbs and interpersonal behavior , 1968 .

[18]  David R. Heise,et al.  Group Dynamics and Attitude-Behavior Relations , 1977 .

[19]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology , 1972 .

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[21]  H. F. Gollob The subject-verb-object approach to social cognition. , 1974 .

[22]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .