Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods

First graders (N = 323) participated in an evidence-based classwide reading program (Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies; PALS). Adual-discrepancy approach was used to identify 56 children whose reading performance and growth rates were substantially below those of average readers, indicating they were not responding sufficiently to PALS. This approach reliably distinguished among unresponsive at-risk, responsive at-risk, and average-performing readers. Nonresponders were assigned randomly to one of three increasingly individualized treatments: PALS, Modified PALS, or tutoring by an adult. No statistically significant between-group differences on reading-related measures were found. Effect sizes (between .30 and .50) comparing groups and proportions of nonresponders following treatment suggest that tutoring was most promising for reducing unresponsiveness.

[1]  T. Conway,et al.  Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. , 1999 .

[2]  J. Torgesen,et al.  Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  L. Cohen.  Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. , 1993 .

[4]  T. Conway,et al.  Intensive Remedial Instruction for Children with Severe Reading Disabilities , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Promoting Word Recognition, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension in Young Children , 2005 .

[6]  Patricia G. Mathes,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for First-Grade Readers: A Tool for Preventing Early Reading Failure , 1999 .

[7]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities. , 1998 .

[8]  Paul Wehman.  A New Era , 2002 .

[9]  Benita A. Blachman,et al.  Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms , 1994 .

[10]  Dawn Eddy Molloy,et al.  The Validity of a Response-to-Instruction Paradigm to Identify Reading Disabilities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Individual Differences and Contextual Factors , 2003 .

[11]  Darlene M. Tangel,et al.  Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children , 1999 .

[12]  R D Abbott,et al.  Early Intervention for Reading Disabilities , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  E. Wiedenbrug,et al.  Early intervention , 2004, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[14]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for First-Grade Readers: Responding to the Needs of Diverse Learners. , 1998 .

[15]  L. Fuchs,et al.  The Validity of Informal Reading Comprehension Measures , 1988 .

[16]  S. Deno,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative , 1985, Exceptional children.

[17]  R. Woodcock.  Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised , 1987 .

[18]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  The Role of Instruction in Learning To Read: Preventing Reading Failure in At-Risk Children. , 1998 .

[19]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Identifying Reading Disabilities by Responsiveness-to-Instruction: Specifying Measures and Criteria , 2004 .

[20]  K. Glenk,et al.  Validity and Reliability , 2008, Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments.

[21]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Is Reading Important in Reading-Readiness Programs? A Randomized Field Trial with Teachers as Program Implementers. , 2001 .

[22]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Monitoring Reading Growth Using Student Recalls: Effects of Two Teacher Feedback Systems , 1989 .

[23]  Ruth Fielding-Barnsley,et al.  Evaluation of a Program to Teach Phonemic Awareness to Young Children. , 1991 .

[24]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English , 1998 .

[25]  R. Abbott,et al.  Comparison of Faster and Slower Responders to Early Intervention in Reading: Differentiating Features of their Language Profiles , 2002 .

[26]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers , 2001 .

[27]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Beginning Word Recognition: Benefits of Training by Segmentation and Whole Word Methods , 1997 .

[28]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. , 1992 .

[29]  Dawn Eddy Molloy,et al.  Responsiveness to General Education Instruction as the First Gate to Learning Disabilities Identification , 2003 .

[30]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters , 2000 .

[31]  I. S. Brown,et al.  Effects of instruction on beginning reading skills in children at risk for reading disability , 1990 .

[32]  Barbara J. Fox,et al.  Phonemic Analysis and Synthesis as Word-Attack Skills. , 1976 .

[33]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Developing First-Grade Reading Fluency through Peer Mediation , 2001 .

[34]  L. Fuchs.  Assessing Intervention Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical Issues , 2003 .

[35]  D. R. Smith,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – Wechsler Individual Achievement Test , 2001 .

[36]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[37]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Reading , 2001 .

[38]  Rollanda E. O'Connor.  Increasing the Intensity of Intervention in Kindergarten and First Grade , 2000 .

[39]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Responsible Inclusion for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  The Underlying Message in LD Intervention Research: Findings from Research Syntheses , 2000 .

[41]  M. Shepherd,et al.  Teaching Phonological Recoding to Young Children with Phonological Processing Deficits: The Effect on Sight-Vocabulary Acquisition , 1997 .

[42]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Prevention and Remediation of Severe Reading Disabilities: Keeping the End in Mind , 1997, Components of Effective Reading Intervention.

[43]  Hallie Kay Yopp,et al.  The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. , 1988 .

[44]  Connie Juel,et al.  What Makes Literacy Tutoring Effective , 1996 .

[45]  D. Speece,et al.  Classification in Context: An Alternative Approach to Identifying Early Reading Disability. , 2001 .

[46]  A. Anastasi.  Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Inclusive Schools Movement and the Radicalization of Special Education Reform , 1994 .

[48]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention , 2002 .

[49]  L. Siegel.  IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[50]  Peter J. Hatcher,et al.  Ameliorating Early Reading Failure by Integrating the Teaching of Reading and Phonological Skills: The Phonological Linkage Hypothesis , 1994 .

[51]  P. Vadasy.  Community-Based Early Reading Intervention for At-Risk First Graders. , 1997 .

[52]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  The alphabetic principle and learning to read. , 1989 .

[53]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .