Validation of various adaptive threshold methods of segmentation applied to follicular lymphoma digital images stained with 3,3’-Diaminobenzidine&Haematoxylin

AbstractThe comparative study of the results of various segmentation methods for the digital images of the follicular lymphoma cancer tissue section is described in this paper. The sensitivity and specificity and some other parameters of the following adaptive threshold methods of segmentation: the Niblack method, the Sauvola method, the White method, the Bernsen method, the Yasuda method and the Palumbo method, are calculated. Methods are applied to three types of images constructed by extraction of the brown colour information from the artificial images synthesized based on counterpart experimentally captured images. This paper presents usefulness of the microscopic image synthesis method in evaluation as well as comparison of the image processing results. The results of thoughtful analysis of broad range of adaptive threshold methods applied to: (1) the blue channel of RGB, (2) the brown colour extracted by deconvolution and (3) the ’brown component’ extracted from RGB allows to select some pairs: method and type of image for which this method is most efficient considering various criteria e.g. accuracy and precision in area detection or accuracy in number of objects detection and so on. The comparison shows that the White, the Bernsen and the Sauvola methods results are better than the results of the rest of the methods for all types of monochromatic images. All three methods segments the immunopositive nuclei with the mean accuracy of 0.9952, 0.9942 and 0.9944 respectively, when treated totally. However the best results are achieved for monochromatic image in which intensity shows brown colour map constructed by colour deconvolution algorithm. The specificity in the cases of the Bernsen and the White methods is 1 and sensitivities are: 0.74 for White and 0.91 for Bernsen methods while the Sauvola method achieves sensitivity value of 0.74 and the specificity value of 0.99. According to Bland-Altman plot the Sauvola method selected objects are segmented without undercutting the area for true positive objects but with extra false positive objects. The Sauvola and the Bernsen methods gives complementary results what will be exploited when the new method of virtual tissue slides segmentation be develop.Virtual SlidesThe virtual slides for this article can be found here: slide 1: http://diagnosticpathology.slidepath.com/dih/webViewer.php?snapshotId=13617947952577 and slide 2: http://diagnosticpathology.slidepath.com/dih/webViewer.php?snapshotId=13617948230017.

[1]  M. Plummer,et al.  International agency for research on cancer. , 2020, Archives of pathology.

[2]  Y. Yasuda,et al.  Data compression for check processing machines , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  J. M. White,et al.  Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction , 1983, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[4]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Document Image Binarization: Evaluation Of Algorithms , 1986, Optics & Photonics.

[5]  A.W.M. Smeulders,et al.  An introduction to image processing , 1991 .

[6]  André Marion,et al.  Introduction to Image Processing , 1990, Springer US.

[7]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  A Review of Caveats in Statistical Nuclear Image Analysis , 1998, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[8]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  A Survey of Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation , 1999 .

[9]  Peter H. Bartels,et al.  Surrogate Endpoint Biomarkers for Clinical Trials of Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention , 1999 .

[10]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Adaptive document image binarization , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[13]  T. Seidal,et al.  Interpretation and Quantification of Immunostains , 2001, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Cell image segmentation for diagnostic pathology , 2001 .

[15]  Haishan Wu,et al.  Image analysis and morphometry in the diagnosis of breast cancer , 2002, Microscopy research and technique.

[16]  Xie Yuan-dan,et al.  Survey on Image Segmentation , 2002 .

[17]  E. Berg,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .

[18]  Hai-Shan Wu,et al.  Applications of Image Analysis to Anatomic Pathology: Realities and Promises , 2003, Cancer investigation.

[19]  Andreas Hoppe,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF A COMBINED TEXTURE AND CONTOUR METHOD FOR SEGMENTATION OF LIGHT MICROSCOPY CELL IMAGES , 2003 .

[20]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Heung-Kook Choi,et al.  Color image analysis for quantifying renal tumor angiogenesis. , 2005, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[22]  Zygmunt Wróbel,et al.  The Cell Structures Segmentation , 2005, CORES.

[23]  P. Siva,et al.  Dynamic segmentation of small image windows for visual servoing , 2005, IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation, 2005.

[24]  G. Kayser,et al.  Theory and implementation of an electronic, automated measurement system for images obtained from immunohistochemically stained slides. , 2006, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[25]  Klaus Kayser,et al.  Introducing Diagnostic Pathology , 2006, Diagnostic pathology.

[26]  G. Kayser,et al.  Towards an automated virtual slide screening: theoretical considerations and practical experiences of automated tissue-based virtual diagnosis to be implemented in the Internet , 2006, Diagnostic pathology.

[27]  H. Yaziji,et al.  Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: What can Go Wrong? , 2006, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[28]  Marylène Lejeune,et al.  Immunohistochemical patterns of reactive microenvironment are associated with clinicobiologic behavior in follicular lymphoma patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Stanislaw Osowski,et al.  Image processing for accurate cell recognition and count on histologic slides. , 2006, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[30]  Pekka Ruusuvuori,et al.  Computational Framework for Simulating Fluorescence Microscope Images With Cell Populations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Marylène Lejeune,et al.  Automated quantification of nuclear immunohistochemical markers with different complexity , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[32]  Peter Hufnagl,et al.  Image standards in Tissue-Based Diagnosis (Diagnostic Surgical Pathology) , 2008, Diagnostic pathology.

[33]  A. Korzyńska,et al.  A Method of Estimation of the Cell Doubling Time on Basis of the Cell Culture Monitoring Data , 2008 .

[34]  Pekka Ruusuvuori,et al.  Synthetic Images of High-Throughput Microscopy for Validation of Image Analysis Methods , 2008, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[35]  S. Osowski,et al.  New automated image analysis method for the assessment of Ki-67 labeling index in meningiomas. , 2010, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[36]  Stanislaw Osowski,et al.  Comparative analysis of methods for accurate recognition of cells through nuclei staining of Ki-67 in neuroblastoma and estrogen/progesterone status staining in breast cancer. , 2009, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[37]  Daniel Racoceanu,et al.  A cognitive virtual microscopic framework for knowlege-based exploration of large microscopic images in breast cancer histopathology , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  Gloria Bueno,et al.  Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the Pathology daily practice. , 2010, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[39]  Jeroen van der Laak,et al.  Ki-67 as a prognostic marker in mantle cell lymphoma—consensus guidelines of the pathology panel of the European MCL Network , 2009, Journal of hematopathology.

[40]  Enrico Macii,et al.  Achieving the way for automated segmentation of nuclei in cancer tissue images through morphology-based approach: A quantitative evaluation , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[41]  Sumeet Dua,et al.  Segmentation of Fluorescence Microscopy Cell Images Using Unsupervised Mining , 2010, The open medical informatics journal.

[42]  Manohar Kuse,et al.  A Classification Scheme for Lymphocyte Segmentation in H&E Stained Histology Images , 2010, ICPR Contests.

[43]  Anna Korzynska,et al.  Segmentation of Moving Cells in Bright Field and Epi-Fluorescent Microscopic Image Sequences , 2010, ICCVG.

[44]  Anna Korzynska,et al.  Segmentation of Stained Lymphoma Tissue Section Images , 2010 .

[45]  Carlos López,et al.  The Method of Immunohistochemical Images Standardization , 2010, IP&C.

[46]  Enrico Macii,et al.  Automated segmentation of tissue images for computerized IHC analysis , 2022 .

[47]  P J Tadrous,et al.  Digital stain separation for histological images , 2010, Journal of microscopy.

[48]  Tomasz Markiewicz,et al.  Accuracy of a remote quantitative image analysis in the whole slide images , 2011, Diagnostic pathology.

[49]  Dominik Spinczyk,et al.  Role of radiologists in CAD life-cycle. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[50]  Tomasz Markiewicz Using MATLAB software with Tomcat server and Java platform for remote image analysis in pathology , 2011, Diagnostic pathology.

[51]  Oscar Déniz-Suárez,et al.  A parallel solution for high resolution histological image analysis , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[52]  M. Iwanowski,et al.  Multistage morphological segmentation of bright-field and fluorescent microscopy images , 2012 .