Disrupting integrin transmembrane domain heterodimerization increases ligand binding affinity, not valency or clustering.

Residues important in the interaction between the 23-residue transmembrane (TM) domains of the integrin alpha(IIb)- and beta(3)-subunits were identified by mutating each non-Leu residue to Leu. Leu substitutions of alpha(IIb) at G972, G976, and T981, and of beta(3) at I693 and G708, increased ligand binding. Substitutions with other amino acids at alpha(IIb)G972 and beta(3)G708 could also increase ligand binding. The results are consistent with and extend the helical interface between the integrin alpha- and beta-subunit TM domains previously defined by cysteine scanning and disulfide bond formation. We differentiated between affinity- and valency-based modes of activation by TM domain mutations. The mutant alpha(IIb) W967C forms disulfide-linked alpha(IIb)-subunits within an (alpha(IIb)beta(3))(2) tetramer. This tetramer behaved as an ideal model for the valency mode of regulation, because it exhibited significantly increased binding to multivalent but not monovalent ligands and basally retained the bent conformation. By contrast, the activating Leu mutants showed increased binding to the monovalent, ligand-mimetic PAC-1 Fab and increased exposure of ligand-induced binding site (LIBS) epitopes, suggesting that they partially adopt an extended conformation. Furthermore, the previously described beta(3)G708N mutation in Chinese hamster ovary cells enhanced ligand binding affinity, not valency, and did not alter cell-surface clustering as defined by confocal microscopy. Our studies provide evidence that disrupting the integrin heterodimeric TM helix-helix interface activates ligand binding mainly by increasing the monomeric affinity for ligand, but not the receptor valency, i.e., clustering.

[1]  Jun Qin,et al.  A Structural Mechanism of Integrin αIIbβ3 “Inside-Out” Activation as Regulated by Its Cytoplasmic Face , 2002, Cell.

[2]  Renhao Li,et al.  Oligomerization of the integrin αIIbβ3: Roles of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Global Conformational Rearrangements in Integrin Extracellular Domains in Outside-In and Inside-Out Signaling , 2002, Cell.

[4]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Allosteric β1 Integrin Antibodies That Stabilize the Low Affinity State by Preventing the Swing-out of the Hybrid Domain* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  J. Lacy,et al.  Molecular cloning and chemical synthesis of a region of platelet glycoprotein IIb involved in adhesive function. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  L. Jennings,et al.  Expression of ligand-induced binding sites on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complexes and the effect of various inhibitors. , 1998, American heart journal.

[7]  Vikas Nanda,et al.  Dimerization of the Transmembrane Domain of Integrin αIIb Subunit in Cell Membranes* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  D. Webb,et al.  Differential Dynamics of α5 Integrin, Paxillin, and α-Actinin during Formation and Disassembly of Adhesions in Migrating Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  J. Weisel,et al.  Long range propagation of conformational changes in integrin alpha IIb beta 3. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  G. Bazzoni,et al.  Are changes in integrin affinity and conformation overemphasized? , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  Wei Yang,et al.  The primacy of affinity over clustering in regulation of adhesiveness of the integrin αLβ2 , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  Renhao Li,et al.  Activation of Integrin αIIbß3 by Modulation of Transmembrane Helix Associations , 2003, Science.

[13]  J. Miller,et al.  Analysis of mutation in human cells by using an Epstein-Barr virus shuttle system , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[14]  R. Albrecht,et al.  Redistribution of the fibrinogen receptor of human platelets after surface activation , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  T. O’Toole,et al.  Determinants of specificity of a baculovirus-expressed antibody Fab fragment that binds selectively to the activated form of integrin alpha IIb beta 3. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[17]  N. Kieffer,et al.  Green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged to the cytoplasmic tail of alphaIIb or beta3 allows the expression of a fully functional integrin alphaIIb(beta3): effect of beta3GFP on alphaIIb(beta3) ligand binding. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  Barry S. Coller,et al.  Structural basis for allostery in integrins and binding to fibrinogen-mimetic therapeutics , 2004, Nature.

[19]  C. Figdor,et al.  The Actin Cytoskeleton Regulates LFA-1 Ligand Binding through Avidity Rather than Affinity Changes* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  W. Knapp Leucocyte typing IV : white cell differentiation antigens , 1989 .

[21]  C. Carman,et al.  Integrin avidity regulation: are changes in affinity and conformation underemphasized? , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  J M Miller,et al.  Adhesion-activating phorbol ester increases the mobility of leukocyte integrin LFA-1 in cultured lymphocytes. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[23]  D. Engelman,et al.  Sequence specificity in the dimerization of transmembrane alpha-helices. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[24]  M. de Virgilio,et al.  Detection of Integrin αIIbβ3Clustering in Living Cells* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Minsoo Kim,et al.  Bidirectional Transmembrane Signaling by Cytoplasmic Domain Separation in Integrins , 2003, Science.

[26]  N. Hogg,et al.  Mechanisms contributing to the activity of integrins on leukocytes , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[27]  M. Ginsberg,et al.  Breaking the Integrin Hinge , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  R. Liddington,et al.  Integrin activation takes shape , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  Y. Ikeda,et al.  A Novel Regulatory Epitope Defined by a Murine Monoclonal Antibody to the Platelet GPIIb-IIIa Complex (αIIbβ3 Integrin) , 1996, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[30]  Wim Timens,et al.  Leucocyte typing V. White cell differentiation antigens , 1995 .

[31]  Christoph Ballestrem,et al.  Marching at the front and dragging behind , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  M. Shuman,et al.  The platelet fibrinogen receptor: an immunogold-surface replica study of agonist-induced ligand binding and receptor clustering , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  Richard O Hynes,et al.  Integrins Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines , 2002, Cell.

[34]  J. Takagi,et al.  Stabilizing the open conformation of the integrin headpiece with a glycan wedge increases affinity for ligand , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Integrin activation and structural rearrangement , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[36]  L. Piccio,et al.  Chemokines trigger immediate beta2 integrin affinity and mobility changes: differential regulation and roles in lymphocyte arrest under flow. , 2000, Immunity.

[37]  J. Oliver,et al.  Colloidal gold labelling of fibrinogen receptors in epinephrine- and ADP-activated platelet suspensions. , 1987, Scanning microscopy.