Study of polarization-dependent energy coupling between near-field optical probe and mesoscopic metal structure

We present an experimental study of the coupling of light from a probe of a scanning near-field optical microscope (SNOM) into a mesoscopic structure consisting of gold stripes with varying separations. We demonstrate that the coupling efficiency depends upon the polarization direction in the probe relative to the stripes as well as the separation between the lines. Two possible explanations for a contrast reversal effect in between s- and p-polarized light are given. One is based on the excitation of a quasi-transverse electric and magnetic mode in the mesoscopic transmission line. For this explanation we have made a prediction of the condition of the maximum coupling efficiency through the approach of impedance matching. The second explanation is based on surface plasmon excitation in the gold structure. The present results can also be of importance in the development of new concepts of probes for SNOM.

[1]  H. Fuchs,et al.  Enhanced light confinement in a near-field optical probe with a triangular aperture. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[2]  Roman Kantor,et al.  Method for increasing sensitivity of shear-force distance control for scanning near-field microscopy , 1999 .

[3]  Igor V. Shvets,et al.  Polarization effects in reflection-mode scanning near-field optical microscopy , 1998 .

[4]  Novotny,et al.  Local Excitation, Scattering, and Interference of Surface Plasmons. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[5]  Reflection-mode scanning near-field optical microscopy: Influence of sample type, tip shape, and polarization of light , 1998 .

[6]  Kai Chang,et al.  Handbook of microwave and optical components , 1989 .

[7]  J. Lodder,et al.  Observation of magnetic domains using a reflection-mode scanning near-field optical microscope , 1997 .

[8]  E. Oesterschulze,et al.  Theoretical investigations of a coaxial probe concept for scanning near-field optical microscopy , 2001 .

[9]  R. Toledo-Crow,et al.  Near‐field differential scanning optical microscope with atomic force regulation , 1992 .

[10]  C. Durkan,et al.  Optical impedance matching with scanning near-field optical microscopy , 2003 .

[11]  S. Bozhevolnyi,et al.  Configurational Resonances in Optical Near-field Microscopy: a Rigorous Point-dipole Approach , 1993 .

[12]  E. Betzig,et al.  Combined shear force and near‐field scanning optical microscopy , 1992 .

[13]  Eric Bourillot,et al.  Squeezing the Optical Near-Field Zone by Plasmon Coupling of Metallic Nanoparticles , 1999 .

[14]  Bernhard Lamprecht,et al.  Optical properties of Ag and Au nanowire gratings , 2001 .

[15]  W. Denk,et al.  Optical stethoscopy: Image recording with resolution λ/20 , 1984 .

[16]  K. Sander.  Microwave components and systems , 1987 .

[17]  Igor V. Shvets,et al.  40 nm resolution in reflection-mode SNOM with λ = 685 nm , 1995 .

[18]  A. Bouhelier,et al.  Electrolytic formation of nanoapertures for scanning near-field optical microscopy , 2001 .

[19]  Volker Deckert,et al.  High-quality near-field optical probes by tube etching , 1999 .

[20]  Motoichi Ohtsu,et al.  INCREASING THROUGHPUT OF A NEAR-FIELD OPTICAL FIBER PROBE OVER 1000 TIMES BY THE USE OF A TRIPLE-TAPERED STRUCTURE , 1998 .