The influence of stimulus location on the brain activation pattern in detection and orientation discrimination. A PET study of visual attention.

This PET study concerns changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) associated with orientation discrimination tasks and with simple detection of the stimulus. The difference in rCBF between discrimination and detection represents the discrimination, or 'task', component of the response. We have examined how such differences are influenced by the position of the visual stimulus and also how they change when a peripheral distractor is added to a relevant central stimulus. We first determined the regions in which the task produced the main effect regardless of stimulus position or distraction with an additional stimulus. In these selected regions, we determined the interactions between task and stimulus position and the interactions between task and stimulus addition. Five regions were more active during orientation discrimination than during stimulus detection: the inferior occipital cortex, the right putamen, the superior parietal lobule, the anterior cingulate cortex and the left lower and the right upper premotor area. Stimulus addition interacted with task only in the lower premotor area. Interactions between the task and stimulus position occurred in the occipital and parietal cortex and in the putamen. When a central stimulus was presented instead of a peripheral one the difference between orientation discrimination and stimulus detection was significantly larger in the inferior occipital lobe and in the right putamen. Conversely, the difference between orientation discrimination and stimulus detection in the superior parietal lobule was significantly larger when a peripheral stimulus was presented instead of a central one.

[1]  J. Duncan Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. , 1996 .

[2]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[3]  D. Robinson,et al.  Covert orienting of attention in macaques. II. Contributions of parietal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P M Grasby,et al.  Brain systems for encoding and retrieval of auditory-verbal memory. An in vivo study in humans. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[7]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Sergent Brain-imaging studies of cognitive functions , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  S. Kobayashi,et al.  Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visuospatial attention. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Activity of inferior temporal neurons during orientation discrimination with successively presented gratings. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Farah Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique of the "locality" assumption. , 1994 .

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  NeuroscL Abstr,et al.  Brain-imaging studies of cognitive functions , 1994 .

[17]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[19]  J Nuyts,et al.  Different perceptual tasks performed with the same visual stimulus attribute activate different regions of the human brain: a positron emission tomography study. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  B. C. Motter Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Galletti,et al.  Functional Properties of Neurons in the Anterior Bank of the Parieto‐occipital Sulcus of the Macaque Monkey , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual cortical inputs to the striatum and subsequent outputs to the pallido‐nigral complex in the monkey , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  E. Vandenbussche,et al.  Orientation discrimination in the cat: a distributed function. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[30]  M. Gilardi,et al.  Physical performance of the latest generation of commercial positron scanner , 1988 .

[31]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  H. Sakai,et al.  Enhancement of inferior temporal neurons during visual discrimination. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 2. Visual processing in the caudal neostriatum , 1984, Brain Research.

[34]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  D. Robinson,et al.  Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The functional properties of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex studied in waking monkeys: foveal sparing and opponent vector organization , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .