Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?

OBJECTIVE To determine problem list completeness related to chronic diseases in electronic medical records (EMRs) and explore clinic and physician factors influencing completeness. METHODS A retrospective analysis of primary care EMR data quality related to seven chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, asthma, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, hypothyroidism, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder) in Manitoba, Canada. We included 119 practices in 18 primary care clinics across urban and rural Manitoba. The main outcome measure was EMR problem list completeness. Completeness was measured by comparing the number of EMR-documented diagnoses to the number of billings associated with each disease. We calculated odds ratios for the effect of clinic patient load and salary type on EMR problem list completeness of the 7 chronic diseases. RESULTS Completeness of EMR problem list for each disease varied widely among clinics. Factors that significantly affected EMR problem list completeness included the primary care provider, the patient load, and the clinic's funding and organization model (ie, salaried, fee-for-service, or residency training clinics). Average rates of completeness were: hypertension, 72%; diabetes, 80%; hypothyroidism, 63%; asthma, 56%; chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, 43%; congestive heart failure, 54%; and coronary artery disease, 64%. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the high variability but generally low quality of problem lists (health condition records) related to 7 common chronic diseases in EMRs. There are systematic physician- and clinic-level factors associated with low data quality completeness. This information may be useful to support improvement in EMR data quality in primary care.

[1]  Adam Wright,et al.  Electronic problem list documentation of chronic kidney disease and quality of care , 2014, BMC Nephrology.

[2]  Jane Taggart,et al.  Health reform: Is routinely collected electronic information fit for purpose? , 2012, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[3]  Tyler Williamson,et al.  Validating the 8 CPCSSN Case Definitions for Chronic Disease Surveillance in a Primary Care Database of Electronic Health Records , 2014, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  R. Roberts,et al.  The art of apology: when and how to seek forgiveness. , 2007, Family practice management.

[5]  Shaun J. Grannis,et al.  A Vision for the Systematic Monitoring and Improvement of the Quality of Electronic Health Data , 2013, MedInfo.

[6]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Barnsley,et al.  Using a data entry clerk to improve data quality in primary care electronic medical records: a pilot study. , 2011, Informatics in primary care.

[8]  Kitty S. Chan,et al.  Review: Electronic Health Records and the Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures: A Review of the Literature , 2010, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[9]  David Gerrett,et al.  A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Michael Bowen and Francis Lau,et al.  Defining and Evaluating Electronic Medical Record Data Quality within the Canadian Context , 2012 .

[11]  T. Williamson,et al.  From patient care to research: a validation study examining the factors contributing to data quality in a primary care electronic medical record database , 2015, BMC Family Practice.

[12]  S. Flocke,et al.  Addressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit. , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[13]  S. Stapley,et al.  The use of electronic databases in primary care research. , 2011, Family practice.

[14]  James Brian Byrd,et al.  Data quality of an electronic health record tool to support VA cardiac catheterization laboratory quality improvement: the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System for Cath Labs (CART) program. , 2013, American heart journal.

[15]  Natalia Beloff,et al.  Exploiting the potential of large databases of electronic health records for research using rapid search algorithms and an intuitive query interface , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Estimating a Reasonable Patient Panel Size for Primary Care Physicians With Team-Based Task Delegation , 2012, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[17]  Sameer Malhotra,et al.  Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[18]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Gayle Halas,et al.  Describing the content of primary care: limitations of Canadian billing data , 2012, BMC Family Practice.

[20]  M. Murray,et al.  Panel size: how many patients can one doctor manage? , 2007, Family practice management.

[21]  Morgan Price,et al.  Adopting electronic medical records: are they just electronic paper records? , 2013, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[22]  Morgan Price,et al.  Measuring EMR Adoption: A Framework and Case Study , 2011 .

[23]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Building a Pan-Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network: Initial Development and Moving Forward , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[24]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  An eight-step method for assessing diagnostic data quality in practice: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an exemplar. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[25]  D. Bates,et al.  Use of an Electronic Problem List by Primary Care Providers and Specialists , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.