Network analysis of trace data for the support of group work: activity patterns in a completely online course

A 16-student, completely online software design course was studied using social network analysis and grounded theory techniques. Bi-directional (read and post) log data of user activity was recorded to understand how small group networks change over time with activity type (individual, peer-to-peer, and small group). Network structure was revealed through sociograms and triangulated with discussion board topics and interview data on group experience. Results show significant differences in network structure across activity types, which are supported by open coding and axial coding of the text of member discussions and editing patterns of member work products. It is also indicated that bi-directional log data, contextualized to specific activities and artifacts, revealed a more accurate and complete description of small group activity than ordinary, uni-directional log data would have. Our findings have implications for tool development revealing group structure and software design for completely online group work.

[1]  Thierry Chanier,et al.  How Social Network Analysis can help to Measure Cohesion in Collaborative Distance-Learning , 2003, CSCL.

[2]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[3]  C. Amelung,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Sense of Community in an Online Learning Environment , 2008 .

[4]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[5]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research—An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[6]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Welcome to the future: ijCSCL volume 2 , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[7]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis for the Study of Online Communities , 2009 .

[8]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Exploring Multiplexity: Social Network Structures in a Computer-Supported Distance Learning Class , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[10]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications , 2000 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[14]  Carlos Caldeira,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[15]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Collaborative Information Behavior in Completely Online Groups , 2010 .

[16]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. , 2007 .

[17]  David Lazer,et al.  Network Theory and Small Groups , 2004 .

[18]  Judit Bar-Ilan Collaborative Information Behavior: User Engagement and Communication Sharing , 2011 .

[19]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[20]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Scholarly Networks as Learning Communities: The Case of TechNet , 2002 .

[21]  Luciano Rossoni,et al.  Models and methods in social network analysis , 2006 .

[22]  Wayne G. Lutters,et al.  Towards a design theory for online communities , 2009, DESRIST.

[23]  L. Freeman Finding Social Groups: A Meta-Analysis of the Southern Women Data , 2003 .

[24]  Vic Lally,et al.  Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[25]  Bing Pan,et al.  The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study , 2004, ETRA.

[26]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[27]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .