A comparative study of three collocation point methods for odd order stochastic response surface method

This paper aims to compare three collocation point methods associated with the odd order stochastic response surface method (SRSM) in a systematical and quantitative way. The SRSM with the Hermite polynomial chaos is briefly introduced first. Then, three collocation point methods, namely the point method, the root method and the without origin method underlying the odd order SRSMs are highlighted. Three examples are presented to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the three methods. The results indicate that the condition that the Hermite polynomial information matrix evaluated at the collocation points has a full rank should be satisfied to yield reliability results with a sufficient accuracy. The point method and the without origin method are much more efficient than the root method, especially for the reliability problems involving a large number of random variables or requiring complex finite element analysis. The without origin method can also produce sufficiently accurate reliability results in comparison with the point and root methods. Therefore, the origin often used as a collocation point is not absolutely necessary. The odd order SRSMs with the point method and the without origin method are recommended for the reliability analysis due to their computational accuracy and efficiency. The order of SRSM has a significant influence on the results associated with the three collocation point methods. For normal random variables, the SRSM with an order equaling or exceeding the order of a performance function can produce reliability results with a sufficient accuracy. The order of SRSM should significantly exceed the order of the performance function involving strongly non-normal random variables.

[1]  Kendall E. Atkinson An introduction to numerical analysis , 1978 .

[2]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  Collocation-based stochastic finite element analysis for random field problems , 2007 .

[3]  S. Isukapalli,et al.  Stochastic Response Surface Methods (SRSMs) for Uncertainty Propagation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[6]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables , 2011 .

[7]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[8]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Geotechnical probabilistic analysis by collocation-based stochastic response surface method: An Excel add-in implementation , 2009 .

[9]  P G Georgopoulos,et al.  Efficient Sensitivity/Uncertainty Analysis Using the Combined Stochastic Response Surface Method and Automated Differentiation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Nut Mao,et al.  Probabilistic analysis and design of strip foundations resting on rocks obeying Hoek-Brown failure criterion , 2012 .

[11]  K. K. Choi,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian Copula , 2009 .

[12]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification Using Multi-Dimensional Hermite Polynomials , 2007 .

[13]  Menner A. Tatang,et al.  An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models , 1997 .

[14]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  A new high-order response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2010 .

[15]  D. Xiu,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos , 2003 .

[16]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Probabilistic collocation method for flow in porous media: Comparisons with other stochastic methods , 2007 .

[17]  S. Isukapalli UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORT-TRANSFORMATION MODELS , 1999 .

[18]  Mort Webster,et al.  Application of the probabilistic collocation method for an uncertainty analysis of a simple ocean model , 1996 .

[19]  M. Eldred,et al.  Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Approaches for Wiener-Askey Generalized Polynomial Chaos. , 2008 .

[20]  D. Dias,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Pressurized Tunnels against Face Stability Using Collocation-Based Stochastic Response Surface Method , 2011 .

[21]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Performance of translation approach for modeling correlated non-normal variables , 2012 .

[22]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .

[23]  Begnaud Francis Hildebrand,et al.  Introduction to numerical analysis: 2nd edition , 1987 .

[24]  Jin Cheng,et al.  Application of the response surface methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions , 2009 .

[25]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[26]  Salvatore Rinaudo,et al.  Stochastic response surface method and tolerance analysis in microelectronics , 2003 .

[27]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  An improved response surface method for reliability analysis of structures , 2012 .

[28]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .