Predicting Group Decisions Based on Group Information Seeking and Assembly Behavior

In group decision making situations, group members may have or may express preferences for decision alternatives only indirectly or incompletely, based on goals and on information collected from the environment. For example, group members undertaking a route-planning task may express a preference only for route segments, such as traveling from home to the supermarket. The method developed in this research uses information collected on task structure and on group information seeking and (implied) preferences to predict group decisions on a dynamic decision making task. An advantage of the method is that it relies upon data collection methods that are either unobtrusive (e.g. clickstream logging) or minimally intrusive (i.e. recording of conversations) to inform predictions. The method is illustrated using data from the performance of a simulated emergency response task by experienced emergency response personnel. Potential use of the proposed method in predicting group decisions in certain dynamic decision making settings is discussed.

[1]  E. Salas,et al.  Human Factors : The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society , 2012 .

[2]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Preference Programming with incomplete ordinal information , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[4]  Sung Pil Moon,et al.  Supporting Complex Decision Making Through Option Awareness , 2013 .

[5]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. , 2005, Psychological review.

[6]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Li-Wei Lee,et al.  Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  David Mendonça,et al.  Group Information Foraging in Emergency Response: An Illustration Incorporating Discrete-Event Simulation , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[10]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Studies in Interactive Communication: I. The Effects of Four Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Cooperative Problem-Solving , 1972 .

[11]  David Mendonça,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Improvisation in Emergency Management , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[12]  Yao Hu,et al.  Group Solution Assembly in Response to a Simulated Emergency , 2008 .

[13]  Juan Carlos Augusto,et al.  A group decision making model for partially ordered preference under uncertainty , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[14]  J. H. Davis Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[15]  Meir Kalech,et al.  Reaching a joint decision with minimal elicitation of voter preferences , 2014, Inf. Sci..