Metadata for describing learning scenarios under the European Higher Education Area paradigm

In this paper we identify the requirements for creating formal descriptions of learning scenarios designed under the European Higher Education Area paradigm, using competences and learning activities as the basic pieces of the learning process, instead of contents and learning resources, pursuing personalization. Classical arrangements of content based courses are no longer enough to describe all the richness of this new learning process, where user profiles, competences and complex hierarchical itineraries need to be properly combined. We study the intersection with the current IMS Learning Design specification and the additional metadata required for describing such learning scenarios. This new approach involves the use of case based learning and collaborative learning in order to acquire and develop competences, following adaptive learning paths in two structured levels.

[1]  Michel Léonard,et al.  Learning Design based on Graphical Knowledge-Modelling , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Miguel-Ángel Sicilia,et al.  Learning processes and processing learning: from organizational needs to learning designs , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version , 2000 .

[4]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[5]  J. González,et al.  Tuning Educational Structures in Europe , 2003 .

[6]  Ralf Klamma,et al.  LM-DTM: an environment for XML-based, LIP/PAPI-compliant deployment, transformation and matching of learner models , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[7]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[8]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications , 2008 .

[9]  Don Peppers,et al.  Making It Personal: How To Profit From Personalization Without Invading Privacy , 2001 .

[10]  Albert Sangrà,et al.  Case method in VTLE: an effective tool for improving learning design , 2007 .

[11]  M. Sicilia Ontology-Based Competency Management: Infrastructures for the Knowledge Intensive Learning Organization , 2005 .

[12]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[13]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Interoperability in Personalized Adaptive Learning , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Julià Minguillón Education and pedagogy with learning objects and learning designs , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Julià Minguillón Alfonso,et al.  Metadata for describing educational competences: the UOC case , 2006 .

[16]  Robert Wagenaar,et al.  Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Final Report – Pilot Project Phase 1 , 2003 .

[17]  C. Myers Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[18]  Julià Minguillón,et al.  Metadata for Describing Educational Competencies: The UOC Case , 2006, WEBIST.

[19]  Enric Mor,et al.  A Three-Level Approach for Analyzing User Behavior in Ongoing Relationships , 2007, HCI.

[20]  Darrell Woelk E-Learning, Semantic Web Services and Competency Ontologies , 2002 .