Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network

Vigorous discussion of the degree of specialization in pollination interactions, combined with advances in the analysis of complex networks, has revitalized the study of entire plantpollinator communities. Noticeably rare, however, are attempts to quantify temporal variation in the structure of plantpollinator networks, and to determine whether the status of species as specialists or generalists is stable. Here we show that network structure varied through time in a montane meadow community from southern California, USA, in that pollinator species did not form the same links with plant species across years. Furthermore, composition of the generalized core group of species in the network varied among summers, as did the identity of those species involved in relationships that appeared to be reciprocally specialized within any one summer. These differences appear to be related to severe drought conditions experienced in the second summer of the 3 year study. In contrast to this variation, the pollinator community remained similarly highly nested in all three summers, even though species were packed into the nested matrix differently from year to year. These results suggest that plantpollinator networks vary in detail through time, while retaining some basic topological properties. This dynamic aspect of community-scale interactions has implications for both ecological and evolutionary inferences about pollination mutualisms.

[1]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web , 2006 .

[2]  N. Bartoloni,et al.  A year‐long plant‐pollinator network , 2006 .

[3]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[4]  Paulo R. Guimar,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006 .

[5]  C. Herrera.  Variation in mutualisms : the spatio temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage , 1988 .

[6]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[8]  Changbao Wu,et al.  Jackknife, Bootstrap and Other Resampling Methods in Regression Analysis , 1986 .

[9]  V. Tepedino,et al.  Spatiotemporal variation in phenology and abundance of floral resources on shortgrass prairie. , 1980 .

[10]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[11]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Moldenke.  Niche specialization and species diversity along a California transect , 1975, Oecologia.

[13]  Donald A. Jackson.  PROTEST: A PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment concordance , 1995 .

[14]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2003 .

[15]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[16]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollination Syndromes and Floral Specialization , 2004 .

[17]  L. Burkle.  Bottom-up effects of nutrient enrichment on plants, pollinators, and their interactions , 2008 .

[18]  D. Inouye,et al.  Variation in timing and abundance of flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth (Ranunculaceae): the roles of snowpack, frost, and La Niña, in the context of climate change , 2002, Oecologia.

[19]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[20]  N. Williams,et al.  Variation in Native Bee Faunas and its Implications for Detecting Community Changes , 2001 .

[21]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[22]  J. Olesen,et al.  The openness of a flower and its number of flower-visitor species , 2007 .

[23]  N. Waser.  Flower Constancy: Definition, Cause, and Measurement , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[25]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant–flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? , 2007, Oecologia.

[26]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Plant-pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. , 2005 .

[27]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. , 2006 .

[28]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[30]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[31]  W. N. Ellis,et al.  Interdependence of native bee faunas and floras in changing Mediterranean communities , 1996 .

[32]  Theodora Petanidou,et al.  Pollinating Fauna of a Phryganic Ecosystem: Composition and Diversity , 1993 .

[33]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2003 .

[34]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[35]  Achim Gathmann,et al.  Foraging ranges of solitary bees , 2002 .

[36]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Relationships between flowering phenology, plant size and reproductive success in shape Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae) , 1998, Plant Ecology.

[37]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants , 2005 .

[38]  G. Polis,et al.  Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Integration of alien plants into a native flower–pollinator visitation web , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  J Memmott,et al.  The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[41]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  The pollination ecology of an assemblage of grassland asclepiads in South Africa. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[42]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATION IN POLLINATION OF A MONTANE HERB: A SEVEN-YEAR STUDY , 2005 .

[43]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[44]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[45]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower , 2007 .

[46]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort , 2007 .

[47]  J. Cane,et al.  Temporally persistent patterns of incidence and abundance in a pollinator guild at annual and decadal scales: the bees of Larrea tridentata , 2005 .

[48]  Lynn V. Dicks,et al.  Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor webs , 2002 .

[49]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.