Mouse models of Down syndrome: how useful can they be? Comparison of the gene content of human chromosome 21 with orthologous mouse genomic regions.

With an incidence of approximately 1 in 700 live births, Down syndrome (DS) remains the most common genetic cause of mental retardation. The phenotype is assumed to be due to overexpression of some number of the >300 genes encoded by human chromosome 21. Mouse models, in particular the chromosome 16 segmental trisomies, Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje, are indispensable for DS-related studies of gene-phenotype correlations. Here we compare the updated gene content of the finished sequence of human chromosome 21 (364 genes and putative genes) with the gene content of the homologous mouse genomic regions (291 genes and putative genes) obtained from annotation of the public sector C57Bl/6 draft sequence. Annotated genes fall into one of three classes. First, there are 170 highly conserved, human/mouse orthologues. Second, there are 83 minimally conserved, possible orthologues. Included among the conserved and minimally conserved genes are 31 antisense transcripts. Third, there are species-specific genes: 111 spliced human transcripts show no orthologues in the syntenic mouse regions although 13 have homologous sequences elsewhere in the mouse genomic sequence, and 38 spliced mouse transcripts show no identifiable human orthologues. While these species-specific genes are largely based solely on spliced EST data, a majority can be verified in RNA expression experiments. In addition, preliminary data suggest that many human-specific transcripts may represent a novel class of primate-specific genes. Lastly, updated functional annotation of orthologous genes indicates genes encoding components of several cellular pathways are dispersed throughout the orthologous mouse chromosomal regions and are not completely represented in the Down syndrome segmental mouse models. Together, these data point out the potential for existing mouse models to produce extraneous phenotypes and to fail to produce DS-relevant phenotypes.

[1]  B. Agranoff,et al.  Advances in Neurochemistry , 1977, Advances in Neurochemistry.

[2]  C. Gissi,et al.  Structural and functional features of eukaryotic mRNA untranslated regions. , 2001, Gene.

[3]  T. Wiltshire,et al.  Use of comparative physical and sequence mapping to annotate mouse chromosome 16 and human chromosome 21. , 2001, Genomics.

[4]  C. Epstein,et al.  Ts1Cje, a partial trisomy 16 mouse model for Down syndrome, exhibits learning and behavioral abnormalities. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  N. Harris,et al.  Genotator: a workbench for sequence annotation. , 1997, Genome research.

[6]  L. Nadel,et al.  The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: evidence for hippocampal dysfunction. , 2003, Child development.

[7]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[8]  M. Hattori,et al.  The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21 , 2000, Nature.

[9]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Trisomy in man. , 1984, Annual review of genetics.

[10]  Pascal Kahlem,et al.  A gene expression map of human chromosome 21 orthologues in the mouse , 2002, Nature.

[11]  K. Gardiner,et al.  Genomic sequence analysis tools: a user's guide. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  Emmanuel Dias-Neto,et al.  The contribution of 700,000 ORF sequence tags to the definition of the human transcriptome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  William H. Majoros,et al.  A Comparison of Whole-Genome Shotgun-Derived Mouse Chromosome 16 and the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[14]  M. Ventura,et al.  Juxtacentromeric region of human chromosome 21: a boundary between centromeric heterochromatin and euchromatic chromosome arms. , 2003, Gene.

[15]  K. Gardiner,et al.  Annotation of human chromosome 21 for relevance to Down syndrome: gene structure and expression analysis. , 2002, Genomics.

[16]  W. Tam.  Identification and characterization of human BIC, a gene on chromosome 21 that encodes a noncoding RNA. , 2001, Gene.

[17]  M. Davisson.  Mouse models of Down syndrome , 2005 .

[18]  M. Hattori,et al.  Identification of two novel primate-specific genes in DSCR. , 2002, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[19]  K. Gardiner,et al.  Ts65Dn – localization of the translocation breakpoint and trisomic gene content in a mouse model for Down syndrome , 2001, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[20]  E. Birney,et al.  Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs , 2002, Nature.

[21]  A. Reymond,et al.  From PREDs and open reading frames to cDNA isolation: revisiting the human chromosome 21 transcription map. , 2001, Genomics.

[22]  M. Suyama,et al.  HUGE: a database for human large proteins identified in the Kazusa cDNA sequencing project. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  C. Scriver,et al.  The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, 8th Edition 2001 , 2001, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[24]  C. V. Jongeneel,et al.  Nineteen additional unpredicted transcripts from human chromosome 21. , 2002, Genomics.

[25]  Shinsei Minoshima,et al.  Erratum: The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21: The chromosome 21 mapping and sequencing consortium (Nature (2000) 405 (311-319)) , 2000 .

[26]  Gregor Eichele,et al.  Human chromosome 21 gene expression atlas in the mouse , 2002, Nature.

[27]  R. Gibbs,et al.  PipMaker--a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. , 2000, Genome research.

[28]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Large-Scale Transcriptional Activity in Chromosomes 21 and 22 , 2002, Science.

[29]  M. Soares,et al.  Normalization and subtraction: two approaches to facilitate gene discovery. , 1996, Genome research.

[30]  C. Epstein,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Region Associated with Behavioral Abnormalities in Mouse Models for Down Syndrome , 2000, Pediatric Research.