Linear Distributed Algorithms For Localization In Mobile Networks

This paper studies the problem of distributed self-localization in noisy networks of mobile agents. Agent mobility is captured by means of a stochastic motion model and the goal of each agent is to dynamically track its (location) state using noisy inter-agent relative distance measurements and communication with a subset of neighboring agents. The Bayesian tracking formulation thus obtained is highly non-standard, in that the distance measurements relate to the location in a non-linear way; and in a mobile setting, it is not clear how connectivity can be maintained for the localization process to provide unambiguous location results. To make the collaborative filtering problem tractable, the paper first presents a barycentric-coordinate based reparametrization of the state-space model; the transformed formulation leads to a bilinear state-space. Under mild network connectivity assumptions, specifically, the inter-agent communication network stays connected on an average, and a structural convexity condition, specifically, infinitely often the agents lie in the convex hull of a set of $m+1$ neighboring agents, where m denotes the dimension of the space, a distributed filtering scheme is proposed that enables each agent to track its location with bounded mean-squared error as long as there is at least one anchor in the network (agent with known location). Simulations are presented to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed distributed filtering procedure and the theoretical results.

[1]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Nonparametric belief propagation for self-localization of sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Minyue Fu,et al.  A Barycentric Coordinate Based Distributed Localization Algorithm for Sensor Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Michel Diaz,et al.  Barycentric Location Estimation for Indoors Localization in Opportunistic Wireless Networks , 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking.

[4]  A.H. Sayed,et al.  Network-based wireless location: challenges faced in developing techniques for accurate wireless location information , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  Gérard Scorletti,et al.  Robust sensor localization with locally-computed, global H∞-design , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[6]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Particle Filters for Mobile Robot Localization , 2001, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice.

[7]  B. Sinopoli,et al.  Distributed sensor localization in Euclidean spaces: Dynamic environments , 2008, 2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.

[8]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Blind Selection of Representative Observations for Sensor Radar Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Usman A. Khan,et al.  A distributed range-based algorithm for localization in mobile networks , 2016, 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[10]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Distributed Sensor Localization in Random Environments Using Minimal Number of Anchor Nodes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Satish Kumar,et al.  Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[12]  J.M.F. Moura,et al.  Distributed localization and tracking with coordinated and uncoordinated motion models , 2009, 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[13]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Distributed Consensus Algorithms in Sensor Networks: Quantized Data and Random Link Failures , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Yibin Hou,et al.  A framework based on barycentric coordinates for localization in wireless sensor networks , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Distributed Localization Via Barycentric Coordinates: Finite-Time Convergence* , 2011 .

[16]  Toru Namerikawa,et al.  Extended Kalman filter-based mobile robot localization with intermittent measurements , 2013 .

[17]  Usman A. Khan,et al.  Localization in Mobile Networks via Virtual Convex Hulls , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[18]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Distributed Consensus Algorithms in Sensor Networks With Imperfect Communication: Link Failures and Channel Noise , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  Usman A. Khan,et al.  An Opportunistic Linear–Convex Algorithm for Localization in Mobile Robot Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Soummya Kar,et al.  DILAND: An Algorithm for Distributed Sensor Localization With Noisy Distance Measurements , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Distributed Power Allocation for Cooperative Wireless Network Localization , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  Usman A. Khan,et al.  Asymptotic stability of stochastic LTV systems with applications to distributed dynamic fusion , 2014, ArXiv.

[23]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  Multilateration localization in the presence of anchor location uncertainties , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[24]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Simultaneous Localization, Mapping and Moving Object Tracking , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[25]  Calton Pu,et al.  Research challenges in environmental observation and forecasting systems , 2000, MobiCom '00.