Thatcher Illusion: Dependence on Angle of Rotation

The expression of a face with its eyes and mouth inverted changes from ‘pleasant’ to ‘grotesque’ as the stimulus is rotated from 180° to 0° (Thatcher illusion). We determined the angular orientation at which this change occurred for three manipulated faces. Mean thresholds for eighteen observers were found to lie between 94° and 100° relative to the vertical with an average overlap of about 15° between an observer's ascending and descending thresholds. The sudden nature and relatively narrow zone of the changeover suggest a neuronal step-tuning of hypothetical face cells in the human brain, underlying the holistic (‘grotesque’) versus componential (‘pleasant’) processing of upright versus upside-down faces. Findings are discussed within the framework of cognitive, neuroimaging, and single-cell studies.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[3]  Is Perceptual Set Negatively Biased? , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  T Valentine,et al.  What's up? The Margaret Thatcher Illusion Revisited , 1985, Perception.

[5]  H. Ridley.  Eye and Brain , 1973 .

[6]  T. Parks,et al.  Thatcher and the Cheshire Cat: Context and the Processing of Facial Features , 1985, Perception.

[7]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  S. McKelvie.  Emotional expression in upside-down faces: evidence for configurational and componential processing. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment , 1970, Nature.

[10]  Inversion and the Thatcher Illusion in Recognition of Emotional Expression , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[12]  S. Carey.  Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Thatcher Illusion as a Test of Configural Disruption , 1997, Perception.

[15]  W. Sjoberg,et al.  Recognition Times for Rotated Normal and “Thatcher” Faces , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.