Reducing roentgenography use. Can patient expectations be altered?

Many roentgenographic tests, including lumbar spine roentgenograms, may be overutilized. We examined the psychological, functional, and financial consequences of omitting spine films for patients with back pain with little risk of underlying systemic illness. Patients were randomized to receive immediate roentgenograms (n = 49) or a brief educational intervention, with roentgenography only for failure to improve (n = 52). After three weeks, 73% of the roentgenography group believed "everyone with back pain should have an x-ray," vs 44% of the education group. After three months, although 31% in the education group had received roentgenograms, overall radiology charges were still far less than those of the roentgenography group. No serious diagnoses were missed, and symptom resolution, functional improvement, and satisfaction were similar for the two groups. Thus, eliminating or delaying spine films need not cause anxiety, dissatisfaction, or dysfunction. This strategy may modify future expectations of roentgenography use and reduce health care costs.

[1]  R. Deyo,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care for Low-Back Pain , 1986, Spine.

[2]  A. Detsky,et al.  When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you found. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  R. Deyo,et al.  Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[4]  V. Mooney,et al.  Spinal Pain Rehabilitation: Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment Results and Development of Predictors for Outcome , 1984, Spine.

[5]  R. Deyo,et al.  Measuring Physical and Psychosocial Function in Patients with Low-Back Pain , 1983, Spine.

[6]  A. Komaroff,et al.  Roentgenograms in primary care patients with acute low back pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1982, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  F. M. Hull.  Diagnosis and prognosis of low back pain in three countries. , 1982, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  H. Sox,et al.  Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests. , 1981, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  P. A. Pedersen.  Prognostic indicators in low back pain. , 1981, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  F. Hall.  Back pain and the radiologist. , 1980, Radiology.

[11]  R. Wood,et al.  The usefulness of x-ray examinations in the evaluation of patients with back pain. , 1978, The Journal of family practice.

[12]  F. Hall.  Overutilization of radiological examinations. , 1976, Radiology.

[13]  Alf Nachemson,et al.  The Lumbar Spine An Orthopaedic Challenge , 1976 .

[14]  J. Fries,et al.  Joint pain or arthritis. , 1976, JAMA.

[15]  A. Komaroff,et al.  Nurse-protocol management of low back pain. Outcomes, patient satisfaction and efficiency of primary care. , 1975, The Western journal of medicine.