Load capacity improvements in nucleic acid based systems using partially open feedback control.

Synthetic biology is facilitating novel methods and components to build in vivo and in vitro circuits to better understand and re-engineer biological networks. Recently, Kim and Winfree have synthesized a remarkably elegant network of transcriptional oscillators in vitro using a modular architecture of synthetic gene analogues and a few enzymes that, in turn, could be used to drive a variety of downstream circuits and nanodevices. However, these oscillators are sensitive to initial conditions and downstream load processes. Furthermore, the oscillations are not sustained since the inherently closed design suffers from enzyme deactivation, NTP fuel exhaustion, and waste product build up. In this paper, we show that a partially open architecture in which an [Symbol: see text]1 adaptive controller, implemented inside an in silico computer that resides outside the wet-lab apparatus, can ensure sustained tunable oscillations in two specific designs of the Kim-Winfree oscillator networks. We consider two broad cases of operation: (1) the oscillator network operating in isolation and (2) the oscillator network driving a DNA tweezer subject to a variable load. In both scenarios, our simulation results show a significant improvement in the tunability and robustness of these oscillator networks. Our approach can be easily adopted to improve the loading capacity of a wide range of synthetic biological devices.

[1]  G. Seelig,et al.  Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[2]  D.L. Elliott,et al.  Feedback systems: Input-output properties , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Y. Sakai,et al.  Programming an in vitro DNA oscillator using a molecular networking strategy , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  Susann Müller,et al.  From multi-omics to basic structures of biological systems. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[5]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Build life to understand it , 2010, Nature.

[6]  V. Noireaux,et al.  An E. coli cell-free expression toolbox: application to synthetic gene circuits and artificial cells. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[7]  Teruo Fujii,et al.  Nucleic acids for the rational design of reaction circuits. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[8]  Hemendra Khakhar.  Kinetic Modeling and simulation of Hydrocracking Process , 2002 .

[9]  G. Seelig,et al.  Enzyme-Free Nucleic Acid Logic Circuits , 2022 .

[10]  M. Bennett,et al.  A fast, robust, and tunable synthetic gene oscillator , 2008, Nature.

[11]  S. Quake,et al.  Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat , 2005, Science.

[12]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  A Logic-Gated Nanorobot for Targeted Transport of Molecular Payloads , 2012, Science.

[13]  D. Y. Zhang,et al.  Engineering Entropy-Driven Reactions and Networks Catalyzed by DNA , 2007, Science.

[14]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S3 Table S1 References Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops , 2022 .

[15]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades , 2011, Nature.

[16]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Scale integration: the structure and dynamics of macromolecular assemblies, cells and tissues. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[17]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes , 2009, Nature.

[18]  Michael C Jewett,et al.  Synthetic in vitro circuits. , 2012, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[19]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Ensemble Bayesian analysis of bistability in a synthetic transcriptional switch. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[20]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[21]  Vincent Noireaux,et al.  Development of an artificial cell, from self-organization to computation and self-reproduction , 2011 .

[22]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  Generalization of L1 adaptive control architecture for switching estimation laws , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[23]  E. Winfree,et al.  Synthetic in vitro transcriptional oscillators , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[24]  M. Reuss,et al.  Kinetic modeling and simulation of in vitro transcription by phage T7 RNA polymerase. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  Christina D Smolke,et al.  From DNA to Targeted Therapeutics: Bringing Synthetic Biology to the Clinic , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[26]  J. Kjems,et al.  Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid , 2009, Nature.

[27]  D. Pincus,et al.  In silico feedback for in vivo regulation of a gene expression circuit , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Vincent Noireaux,et al.  Genome replication, synthesis, and assembly of the bacteriophage T7 in a single cell-free reaction. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[29]  R. Murray,et al.  Timing molecular motion and production with a synthetic transcriptional clock , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Erik Winfree,et al.  DNA as a universal substrate for chemical kinetics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  P. Rothemund.  Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[32]  E. Winfree,et al.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches , 2006, Molecular systems biology.