Determination of effective brain connectivity from functional connectivity with application to resting state connectivities.

Neural field theory insights are used to derive effective brain connectivity matrices from the functional connectivity matrix defined by activity covariances. The symmetric case is exactly solved for a resting state system driven by white noise, in which strengths of connections, often termed effective connectivities, are inferred from functional data; these include strengths of connections that are underestimated or not detected by anatomical imaging. Proximity to criticality is calculated and found to be consistent with estimates obtainable from other methods. Links between anatomical, effective, and functional connectivity and resting state activity are quantified, with applicability to other complex networks. Proof-of-principle results are illustrated using published experimental data on anatomical connectivity and resting state functional connectivity. In particular, it is shown that functional connection matrices can be used to uncover the existence and strength of connections that are missed from anatomical connection matrices, including interhemispheric connections that are difficult to track with techniques such as diffusion spectrum imaging.

[1]  R. F. Galán,et al.  On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity , 2008, PLoS ONE.

[2]  Sacha Jennifer van Albada,et al.  Neurophysiological changes with age probed by inverse modeling of EEG spectra , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  P A Robinson,et al.  Geometric effects on complex network structure in the cortex. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[5]  S. Laughlin,et al.  An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Robinson,et al.  Prediction of electroencephalographic spectra from neurophysiology. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  P A Robinson,et al.  Estimation of multiscale neurophysiologic parameters by electroencephalographic means , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A geometric view of global signal confounds in resting-state functional MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Identification of Optimal Structural Connectivity Using Functional Connectivity and Neural Modeling , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  James J. Wright,et al.  Propagation and stability of waves of electrical activity in the cerebral cortex , 1997 .

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Network discovery with large DCMs , 2013, NeuroImage.

[15]  P A Robinson,et al.  Interrelating anatomical, effective, and functional brain connectivity using propagators and neural field theory. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Broadband Criticality of Human Brain Network Synchronization , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[18]  P Riley,et al.  Dynamical reconnection and stability constraints on cortical network architecture. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[19]  Wen-Xu Wang,et al.  Noise bridges dynamical correlation and topology in coupled oscillator networks. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[20]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Critical phenomena in complex networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[21]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[22]  D. Long Networks of the Brain , 2011 .

[23]  John R. Terry,et al.  A unifying explanation of primary generalized seizures through nonlinear brain modeling and bifurcation analysis. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  G. L. Payne,et al.  Relativistic Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .

[25]  Walter Greiner,et al.  Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Wave Equations , 1997 .

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[27]  P. Robinson,et al.  Dynamics of large-scale brain activity in normal arousal states and epileptic seizures. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  G Tononi,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Donald L Rowe,et al.  Estimation of neurophysiological parameters from the waking EEG using a biophysical model of brain dynamics. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Neurobiologically Realistic Determinants of Self-Organized Criticality in Networks of Spiking Neurons , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Hemodynamic Traveling Waves in Human Visual Cortex , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  J. Lewin Functional MRI: An introduction to methods , 2003 .

[37]  M. Greicius,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[39]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. R. McIntosh,et al.  The effects of physiologically plausible connectivity structure on local and global dynamics in large scale brain models , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  P A Robinson,et al.  Discrete-network versus modal representations of brain activity: why a sparse regions-of-interest approach can work for analysis of continuous dynamics. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.