Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech.

In many studies, the influence of intelligibility of the interfering speech is avoided by reversing it in time. Usually, intelligibility with time-reversed interfering speech indeed is higher compared to that with normal interfering speech. However, due to the nature of speech, reversed speech also gives rise to increased forward masking. The latter will result in a decrease in intelligibility. Thus, differences in intelligibility as a consequence of reversing speech in time are due to two opposite effects. This paper describes a speech reception threshold (SRT) test with intelligible and unintelligible interfering speech played normally and time-reversed. With Dutch listeners, Swedish reversed interfering speech gave a rise in SRT of 2.3 dB compared with the Swedish interfering speech (played normally). The difference can be attributed to differences in forward masking. Dutch time-reversed interfering speech gave a decrease in SRT of 4.3 dB compared to (intelligible) Dutch interfering speech. The latter is the result of both a release from informational masking and an increase in forward masking. Therefore, the amount of informational masking is larger than 4.3 dB and, if one assumes similar differences in forward masking for Dutch and Swedish speech, may amount to 6.6 dB.

[1]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E R Hafter,et al.  An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[4]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Bronkhorst,et al.  Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. Dreschler,et al.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  S. Rosen Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  R Plomp,et al.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B C Moore,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T Houtgast,et al.  Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R. Schlauch,et al.  Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment: Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditivos , 2001 .

[17]  T. Irino,et al.  Temporal asymmetry in the auditory system. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones , 1989, Speech Commun..

[20]  J. M. Festen Speech-Reception Threshold in a Fluctuating Background Sound and its Possible Relation to Temporal Auditory Resolution , 1987 .

[21]  Robert P. Carlyon,et al.  Spread of excitation produced by maskers with damped and ramped envelopes , 1996 .