Automatic detection and size quantification of infarcts by myocardial perfusion SPECT: clinical validation by delayed-enhancement MRI.

UNLABELLED We aimed to validate the accuracy of a new automated myocardial perfusion SPECT quantification based on normal limits for detection and sizing of infarcts, using delayed-enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) as a gold standard. METHODS Eighty-two immediate (201)Tl rest scans and 26 (201)Tl delayed redistribution scans were compared with resting DE-MRI scans acquired within 24 h of SPECT acquisition. The immediate (201)Tl scans were considered for validation of infarct detection and the delayed (201)Tl scans were considered for infarct sizing. A simplified quantification scheme was used in which defect extent (EXT) and total perfusion deficit (TPD) parameters were derived automatically from SPECT images by comparison with sex-matched normal limits and applying a 3.0 average deviation criterion. The total extent of hyperenhancement expressed as the percentage of the left ventricle was derived from DE-MRI images by visual definition of myocardial contours and defects. DE-MRI and SPECT images were fused in 3 dimensions for visual comparison. Phantom data were also quantified using the same EXT and TPD measures for defects ranging from 5% to 70% of the myocardium. RESULTS The area under the receiver-operator-characteristic curve for the detection of infarct on immediate rest scans was 0.91 +/- 0.03 for EXT and 0.90 +/- 0.03 for TPD (P = not significant). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of infarct by EXT on immediate (201)Tl rest scan were 87% and 91%, respectively, with the optimal defect size threshold of 4%. Six of 7 cases with DE-MRI defects < 5% were detected by SPECT. Infarct sizes obtained from DE-MRI correlated well with EXT (slope = 0.94, offset = 3.8%; r = 0.84) and TPD (slope = 0.75, offset = 4.2%; r = 0.85) obtained from delayed SPECT (201)Tl scans. Excellent correlation was observed between the SPECT quantification and the physical defect size for the phantom data. The actual size of the defect was better estimated by EXT (slope = 1.00, offset 1.33%; r = 0.99) than by TPD (slope = 0.79, offset = 1.9%; r = 0.99). CONCLUSION Automated quantification of the EXT on myocardial perfusion SPECT images can reliably detect infarcts and measure infarct sizes.

[1]  D D Watson,et al.  Quantification of area at risk during coronary occlusion and degree of myocardial salvage after reperfusion with technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl isonitrile. , 1990, Circulation.

[2]  J. Oshinski,et al.  Imaging Time After Gd-DTPA Injection Is Critical in Using Delayed Enhancement to Determine Infarct Size Accurately With Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  C. Rochitte,et al.  Quantification of left ventricular infarcted mass on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between planimetry and the semiquantitative visual scoring method. , 2004, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[4]  D. Berman,et al.  Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[6]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Four-dimensional multimodality image registration applied to gated SPECT and gated MRI , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study , 2003, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Berman,et al.  Reverse redistribution of thallium-201. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  D. Berman,et al.  Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[11]  E. Atalar,et al.  Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  Lars Edenbrandt,et al.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion defects using three different software packages , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  D. Berman,et al.  Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Gerhard Adam,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  D. Berman,et al.  A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. II: validation and diagnostic yield. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  T L Faber,et al.  Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images: an integrated method. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Comparison of reinjection thallium 201 and resting technetium 99m sestamibi tomographic images for the quantification of infarct size after acute myocardial infarction , 1994, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Assessment of infarct size and severity by quantitative myocardial SPECT: results from a multicenter study using a cardiac phantom. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  B. Schnackenburg,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Viability With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  Yves D'Asseler,et al.  Automatic quantification of defect size using normal templates: a comparative clinical study of three commercially available algorithms , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J R Galt,et al.  Effects of myocardial wall thickness on SPECT quantification. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[23]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. , 1999, Circulation.

[24]  R. Kim,et al.  Transmural Extent of Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Long-Term Improvement in Contractile Function , 2001, Circulation.

[25]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  João Luiz Fernandes Petriz,et al.  Quantificação da massa infartada do ventrículo esquerdo pela ressonância magnética cardíaca: comparação entre a planimetria e o método de escore visual semi-quantitativo , 2004 .

[27]  T D Miller,et al.  Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with (99m)Tc-sestamibi: A measure of the efficacy of therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[28]  Edwin Wu,et al.  Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction , 2001, The Lancet.

[29]  D S Berman,et al.  Comparative methods for quantifying myocardial infarct size by thallium-201 SPECT. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  G Germano,et al.  A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: technical principles and reproducibility. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Y. H. Liu,et al.  Validation of the Yale circumferential quantification method using 201Tl and 99mTc: a phantom study. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  R. Gibbons,et al.  The value of 24-hour images after rest thallium injection , 2002, Nuclear medicine communications.

[33]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  A J Sinusas,et al.  Quantification of SPECT myocardial perfusion images: Methodology and validation of the Yale-CQ method , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[35]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Medical Imaging 2003: Image Processing , 2003 .

[36]  J. Pepper,et al.  Comparison of 201Tl, 99mTc-tetrofosmin, and dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging for identifying hibernating myocardium. , 1998, Circulation.

[37]  R. Kim,et al.  Reproducibility of Chronic Infarct Size Measurement by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[38]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[39]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  P J Slomka,et al.  Automated alignment and sizing of myocardial stress and rest scans to three-dimensional normal templates using an image registration algorithm. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  G Germano,et al.  Operator-less processing of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.