Characterization of flow properties of cohesive powders: A comparative study of traditional and new testing methods

Abstract The characterization of powder flow properties is often required for reliable design and proper operation of industrial processes. The effect of the state of compaction and bed voidage on bulk solids flowability is probably the most critical area of understanding. The goal of the present study is to compare traditional characterization techniques with methodologies provided by the FT4 Powder Rheometer (Freeman Technology). The data from six different methods, covering low to high stress levels, were compared to examine the hypothetical relationships between them. These techniques were also evaluated with regard to their ability to discriminate between different powders. To make a comparison of the testing methods, a range of seven materials was selected to cover the entire range of fine powders, i.e., from nanoparticles to group B powders. The results showed that the characterization techniques clearly have different working ranges depending on the level of cohesiveness of the powder. The powder rheometer was found to allow quick and reproducible measurements of the powder response to various environments. The different blade testing methods provided data that were in good agreement with traditional characterization techniques. However, the powder rheometer measurements were difficult to interpret because they depend on many physical properties and environmental parameters. They were particularly useful to compare similar materials but did not allow good discrimination between very different materials. A more detailed understanding of the physical phenomena involved in blade testing techniques is still needed. Finally, this study showed that powders and bulk materials cannot be viewed as invariant entities. Their flow properties cannot be predicted by only one indicator. The connection of several characterization methods is required to ensure a complete understanding of the powder flow properties over a wide range of conditions. This approach allows better insight into the powder/process relationship.

[1]  E. C. Abdullah,et al.  Cohesiveness and flowability properties of silica gel powder , 2010 .

[2]  Derek Wilkinson,et al.  Determination of minimum fluidization velocity by pressure fluctuation measurement , 1995 .

[3]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Fluidisation of fine and very dense hardmetal powders , 1990 .

[4]  Effect of inclination on gas-fluidized beds of fine cohesive powders , 2008 .

[5]  J. Couderc,et al.  Incipient fluidization and particulate systems , 1985 .

[6]  P. Guigon,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Fluidisation Behaviour of Geldart C Glass Powders , 2006 .

[7]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Types of gas fluidization of cohesive granular materials. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  J. R. Cooke,et al.  Measuring shear properties and normal stresses generated within a rotational shear cell for consolidated and non-consolidated powders , 2009 .

[9]  N. Fatah Study and comparison of micronic and nanometric powders : Analysis of physical, flow and interparticle properties of powders , 2009 .

[10]  Kimio Kawakita,et al.  Some considerations on powder compression equations , 1971 .

[11]  T. Longo,et al.  The fluidization process of binary mixtures of solids: Development of the approach based on the fluidization velocity interval , 2008 .

[12]  Mooson Kwauk,et al.  Fluidization of fine particles , 1998 .

[13]  N. Fatah,et al.  DESCRIPTION OF CONSOLIDATION FORCES ON NANOMETRIC POWDERS , 2010 .

[14]  Anders Axelsson,et al.  Comparison of different flowability tests for powders for inhalation , 2004 .

[15]  T. Longo,et al.  The fluidization pattern of density-segregating binary mixtures , 2008 .

[16]  J. Drahoš,et al.  EVALUATION OF MINIMUM FLUIDIZING VELOCITY IN GAS FLUIDIZED BED FROM PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS , 1985 .

[17]  A. W. Nienow,et al.  The minimum fluidisation velocity, bed expansion and pressure-drop profile of binary particle mixtures , 1979 .

[18]  Fernando J. Muzzio,et al.  Shear and flow behavior of pharmaceutical blends — Method comparison study , 2011 .

[19]  Paola Lettieri,et al.  An investigation of the effect of the interparticle forces on the fluidization behaviour of fine powders linked with rheological studies. , 2007 .

[20]  R L Carr,et al.  EVALUATING FLOW PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS , 1965 .

[21]  Mindy Rittner,et al.  Nanoparticles: What's now, what's next? , 2003 .

[22]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Effect of interparticle forces on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fluidized aerogels , 1985 .

[23]  J. Valverde,et al.  The Sevilla Powder Tester: A Tool for Characterizing the Physical Properties of Fine Cohesive Powders at Very Small Consolidations , 2004 .

[24]  D. Geldart Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[25]  Maribel Rios,et al.  Developments in powder flow testing , 2006 .

[26]  C. Xu,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study on the agglomeration arising from fluidization of cohesive particles—effects of mechanical vibration , 2005 .

[27]  G. Enstad,et al.  Flowability Measurements of Pharmaceutical Powder Mixtures with Poor Flow Using Five Different Techniques , 2004, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[28]  H. Kono,et al.  Segregation and Agglomeration of Type C Powders from Homogeneously Aerated Type A-C Powder Mixtures During Fluidization , 1987 .

[29]  B Formisani,et al.  A fundamental approach to the phenomenology of fluidization of size segregating binary mixtures of solids , 2001 .

[30]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Prediction of agglomerate sizes in bubbling fluidized beds of group C powders , 1998 .

[31]  Sandra Rocha,et al.  Prediction of minimum fluidization velocity of gas–solid fluidized beds by pressure fluctuation measurements — Analysis of the standard deviation methodology , 2007 .

[32]  D. Schulze Powders and Bulk Solids: Behavior, Characterization, Storage and Flow , 2021 .

[33]  James Prescott,et al.  On powder flowability , 2000 .

[34]  Hsiaotao Bi,et al.  A critical review of the complex pressure fluctuation phenomenon in gas–solids fluidized beds , 2007 .

[35]  Jörg Schwedes,et al.  Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids , 2003 .

[36]  Lii-ping Leu,et al.  Prediction of pressure fluctuations and minimum fluidization velocity of binary mixtures of Geldart group B particles in bubbling fluidized beds , 2000 .

[37]  C. Sobrino,et al.  Standard deviation of absolute and differential pressure fluctuations in fluidized beds of group B particles , 2008 .

[38]  V. Hlavácek,et al.  Fluidization of micron-size ceramic powders in a small-diameter fluidized bed , 1994 .

[39]  Derek Geldart,et al.  The use of bulk density measurements as flowability indicators , 1999 .

[40]  A. W. Nienow,et al.  Particle mixing and segregation in gas fluidised beds. A review , 1976 .

[41]  B. Leclerc,et al.  Rheological characterization of pharmaceutical powders using tap testing, shear cell and mercury porosimeter. , 1999, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[42]  Reg Freeman,et al.  Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders — A comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell , 2007 .

[43]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization of Fine Powders: Cohesive versus Dynamic Aggregation , 2013 .

[44]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization of nanoparticles: A simple equation for estimating the size of agglomerates , 2008 .

[45]  L. T. Fan,et al.  Analysis of pressure fluctuations in a gas-solid fluidized bed , 1984 .

[46]  Wen-Ching Yang,et al.  Fluidization of Fine Cohesive Powders and Nanoparticles-A Review , 2005 .

[47]  Katsuki Kusakabe,et al.  FLUIDIZATION STATE OF ULTRAFINE POWDERS , 1988 .

[48]  Derek Geldart,et al.  Fluidization of cohesive powders , 1984 .

[49]  J. Visser,et al.  Van der Waals and other cohesive forces affecting powder fluidization , 1989 .

[50]  Jonathan Seville,et al.  Interparticle forces in fluidisation: a review , 2000 .

[51]  A. W. Nienow,et al.  Fluidised binary mixtures in which the denser component may be flotsam , 1980 .

[52]  D. Doh,et al.  Determination of minimum fluidization velocity by the statistical analysis of pressure fluctuations in a Gas-Solid fluidized bed , 1990 .

[53]  P. Guigon,et al.  Characterization of Flow Properties of Powder Coatings Used in the Automotive Industry , 2004 .

[54]  I. Zimmermann,et al.  Effect of glidants in binary powder mixtures , 2004 .

[55]  N. Fatah,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND FLUIDIZATION OF THE COHESIVE POWDERS: AGGLOMERATES SIZES APPROACH , 2008 .

[56]  Alex C. Hoffmann,et al.  PARTICLE SEGREGATION IN FLUIDISED BINARY MIXTURES , 1993 .