Can histopathologists reliably diagnose molar pregnancy?

AIMS--To assess the degree of difficulty in diagnosing partial mole by analysing intraobserver and interobserver agreement among a group of pathologists for these diagnoses. METHODS--Fifty mixed cases of partial mole, complete mole, and non-molar pregnancy were submitted to seven histopathologists, two of whom are expert gynaecological pathologists; the other five were district general hospital consultants, one of whom works in Australia. These participants gave each slide a firm diagnosis of either partial mole, complete mole, or non-molar pregnancy. Some 12 months later, the slides were recorded and again submitted for a second diagnostic round to assess intraobserver as well as interobserver agreement. Standard histological criteria for each diagnostic category were circulated with the slides. RESULTS--kappa statistics showed that complete mole could be reliably distinguished from non-molar pregnancy, but neither non-molar pregnancy nor complete mole could be easily differentiated from partial mole. In only 35 out of 50 cases was there agreement between five or more of the seven participants. Agreement between the expert gynaecological pathologists was no better than for others in the group. Interestingly, the intraobserver agreement for each pathologist was good to excellent. CONCLUSIONS--These results imply that the reported histological criteria are either not being applied consistently or that they are lacking in practical use. An atypical growth pattern of trophoblast, rather than the polar accentuation seen in normal first trimester pregnancies, seems to be the important diagnostic histological feature for partial mole. Ploidy studies might also help with problem cases.

[1]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Natural History of Partial Molar Pregnancy , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  R. Fisher,et al.  A prospective genetic study of complete and partial hydatidiform moles. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  K. Benirschke Flow cytometry for all mole-like abortion specimens. , 1989, Human pathology.

[4]  C. Elston Gestational Trophoblastic Disease , 1988 .

[5]  R. Coffey,et al.  Transforming growth factor-β isoforms in mammary neoplasia: More questions than answers , 1992 .

[6]  A. Silman,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. , 1992, BMJ.

[7]  J. Watt,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis in 100 spontaneous abortions in North‐East Scotland , 1986, Clinical genetics.

[8]  S. Lawler,et al.  Gestational trophoblastic tumours following initial diagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole , 1990, The Lancet.

[9]  B. Brambati,et al.  Prevalence and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in a sample of first trimester internal abortions. , 1987, Human reproduction.

[10]  S. Behmard,et al.  DISCREPANCIES IN THE HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF HYDATIDIFORM MOLE , 1979, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  C. Elston,et al.  Diagnosis of molar pregnancy and persistent trophoblastic disease by flow cytometry. , 1987, Journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  H. Fox,et al.  Biopsy pathology of the endometrium , 1989 .

[13]  F. Bieber,et al.  The biology of tetraploid hydatidiform moles: histopathology, cytogenetics, and flow cytometry. , 1989, Human pathology.

[14]  H. Fox,et al.  Use of proliferation cell nuclear antigen immunoreactivity for distinguishing hydropic abortions from partial hydatidiform moles. , 1993, Journal of clinical pathology.

[15]  S. Heifetz,et al.  In situ choriocarcinoma arising in partial hydatidiform mole: implications for the risk of persistent trophoblastic disease. , 1992, Pediatric pathology.

[16]  V. Sivanesaratnam,et al.  Malignant Evolution with Fatal Outcome in a Patient with Partial Hydatidiform Mole , 1981, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[17]  A. E. Szulman Trophoblastic disease: clinical pathology of hydatidiform moles. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[18]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Diagnosis and management of the primary hydatidiform mole. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[19]  S. Lawler,et al.  Unmasking moles , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  D. Weinberg,et al.  Hydatidiform moles. Application of flow cytometry in diagnosis. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  J. Lage,et al.  Choriocarcinoma following a partial hydatidiform mole: a case report. , 1992, Human pathology.

[22]  Szulman Ae Trophoblastic disease: clinical pathology of hydatidiform moles. , 1988 .

[23]  C. Elston,et al.  Hydatidiform mole in Nottingham: a 12-year retrospective epidemiological and morphological study. , 1985, Placenta.