Influence of propeller configuration on propulsion system efficiency of multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles make use of multiple propellers, mounted on arms, to produce the required lift. This article investigates the influence on propulsion system efficiency in hover due to the configuration of these propellers. Influence of pusher or puller configuration of the propeller, number of blades, shape and dimensions of the arm, coaxial and overlapping propellers, is presented. A dedicated test bench that allows testing of various experimental setups is designed and built in order to realistically represent multi-rotor arms. Test results show that a two-bladed pusher configuration is most efficient and slenderness of the arm has more influence on efficiency than shape. A coaxial propulsion system approaches the efficiency of a single-prop system at high disk loadings. Finally, interference effects due to overlapping propellers are discussed.

[1]  Nicholas Krouglicof,et al.  Propeller dynamometer for small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2010, CCECE 2010.

[2]  Roman Czyba,et al.  Modeling and identification of electric propulsion system for multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle design , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[3]  Longfei Zhu,et al.  Novel Quadrotor Forward-Flight Model Based on Wake Interference , 2015 .

[4]  Fabrizio Giulietti,et al.  Maximum endurance for battery-powered rotary-wing aircraft , 2015 .

[5]  N. Fernandes Design and construction of a multi-rotor with various degrees of freedom , 2011 .

[6]  Sergey V Shkarayev,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of VTOL Micro Air Vehicles , 2007 .

[7]  Asokan Thondiyath,et al.  Design and analysis of a novel quadrotor system - VOOPS , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[8]  Kailash Kotwani,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Propulsion System for Mini Aerial Vehicle , 2004 .

[9]  W. Froude On the elementary relation between pitch, slip, and propulsive efficiency , 1920 .

[10]  R. Mahony,et al.  Aerodynamics of Rotor Blades for Quadrotors , 2016, 1601.00733.

[11]  Patrick F. Dunn,et al.  Compact dynamometer system that can accurately determine propeller performance , 1992 .

[12]  J. De Schutter,et al.  The design and construction of a high endurance hexacopter suited for narrow corridors* , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).