Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment.

Recent research on contingency judgment indicates that the judged predictiveness of a cue is dependent on the predictive strengths of other cues. Two classes of models correctly predict such cue interaction: associative models and statistical models. However, these models differ in their predictions about the effect of trial order on cue interaction. In five experiments reported here, college students viewed trial-by-trial data regarding several medical symptoms and a disease, judging the predictive strength of each symptom with respect to the disease. The results indicate that trial order influences the manner in which cues interact, but that neither the associative nor the statistical models can fully account for the data pattern. A possible variation of an associative account is discussed.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  The display of information and the judgment of contingency. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  L. Beach,et al.  Man as an Intuitive Statistician , 2022 .

[4]  L. Kamin Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[5]  E. Fischer Conditioned Reflexes , 1942, American journal of physical medicine.

[6]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[7]  R. Rescorla Pavlovian conditioned inhibition , 1969 .

[8]  B. Campbell,et al.  Punishment and aversive behavior , 1969 .

[9]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[10]  H. Kelley The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[11]  N. Mackintosh Blocking of conditioned suppression: role of the first compound trial. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[13]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Associations in Pavlovian conditioned inhibition , 1977 .

[14]  Laura A. Freberg,et al.  The extinction of within-compound flavor associations , 1978 .

[15]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[17]  H. Shaklee,et al.  A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[18]  R. Rescorla Within-signal learning in autoshaping , 1981 .

[19]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers , 1981 .

[20]  R. Bolles,et al.  A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing , 1981 .

[21]  Ruth Beyth-Marom,et al.  Perception of correlation reexamined , 1982 .

[22]  R. Rescorla Some consequences of associations between the excitor and the inhibitor in a conditioned inhibition paradigm. , 1982 .

[23]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Within-compound associations in unblocking , 1983 .

[24]  D. Krantz,et al.  The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[25]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Perception of causal relations in humans: Factors affecting judgments of response-outcome contingencies under free-operant procedures☆ , 1983 .

[26]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : memory mechanisms , 1983 .

[27]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Judgement of Act-Outcome Contingency: The Role of Selective Attribution , 1984 .

[28]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. , 1985 .

[29]  D. Shanks Forward and Backward Blocking in Human Contingency Judgement , 1985 .

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  G. O. Stone,et al.  An analysis of the delta rule and the learning of statistical associations , 1986 .

[32]  D. Shanks Selective attribution and the judgment of causality , 1986 .

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[35]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Associative Accounts of Causality Judgment , 1988 .

[36]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  D. Medin,et al.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  W. Estes,et al.  Base-rate effects in category learning: a comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  D R Shanks,et al.  Selectional processes in causality judgment , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem , 1989 .

[41]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A Theory of Conditioning: Inductive Learning within Rule-Based Default Hierarchies. , 1989 .

[42]  P. Cheng,et al.  A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  E. Wasserman Attribution of Causality to Common and Distinctive Elements of Compound Stimuli , 1990 .

[44]  S. W. Ellacott An Analysis of the Delta Rule , 1990 .

[45]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. , 1990, Psychological review.

[46]  G. Chapman,et al.  Cue interaction in human contingency judgment , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[47]  D. Meyer,et al.  Function learning: induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.