Timing of Landsat Overpasses Effectively Captures Flow Conditions of Large Rivers

Satellites provide a temporally discontinuous record of hydrological conditions along Earth’s rivers (e.g., river width, height, water quality). The degree to which archived satellite data effectively capture the overall population of river flow frequency is unknown. Here, we use the entire archives of Landsat 5, 7, and 8 to determine when a cloud-free image is available over the United States Geological Survey (USGS) river gauges located on Landsat-observable rivers. We compare the flow frequency distribution derived from the daily gauge record to the flow frequency distribution derived from ideally sampling gauged discharge based on the timing of cloud-free Landsat overpasses. Examining the patterns of flow frequency across multiple gauges, we find that there is not a statistically significant difference between the flow frequency distribution associated with observations contained within the Landsat archive and the flow frequency distribution derived from the daily gauge data (α = 0.05), except for hydrological extremes like maximum and minimum flow. At individual gauges, we find that Landsat observations span a wide range of hydrological conditions (97% of total flow variability observed in 90% of the study gauges) but the degree to which the Landsat sample can represent flow frequency distribution varies from location to location and depends on sample size. The results of this study indicate that the Landsat archive is, on average, representative of the temporal frequencies of hydrological conditions present along Earth’s large rivers with broad utility for hydrological, ecologic and biogeochemical evaluations of river systems.

[1]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  River discharge estimation at daily resolution from satellite altimetry over an entire river basin , 2017 .

[2]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  The National Stream Quality Accounting Network: a flux‐based approach to monitoring the water quality of large rivers , 2001 .

[3]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite‐derived North American River Width data set , 2015 .

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  RivaMap: An automated river analysis and mapping engine , 2017 .

[5]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  Global extent of rivers and streams , 2018, Science.

[6]  G. Fiske,et al.  Quantifying CDOM and DOC in major Arctic rivers during ice-free conditions using Landsat TM and ETM+ data , 2018 .

[7]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope , 2016 .

[8]  L. Rijn Sediment Transport, Part II: Suspended Load Transport , 1984 .

[9]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[10]  L. Smith Satellite remote sensing of river inundation area, stage, and discharge: a review , 1997 .

[11]  Dinh Thi Lan Anh,et al.  River Discharge Estimation based on Satellite Water Extent and Topography: An Application over the Amazon , 2019, Journal of Hydrometeorology.

[12]  Christer Nilsson,et al.  Linking Flow Regime and Water Quality in Rivers: a Challenge to Adaptive Catchment Management , 2008 .

[13]  Laurence C. Smith,et al.  RivWidth: A Software Tool for the Calculation of River Widths From Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[14]  C. Gleason,et al.  Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  P. Ciais,et al.  Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters , 2013, Nature.

[16]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  The past and future of global river ice , 2018, Nature.

[17]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  The SWOT Mission and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[18]  J. Pekel,et al.  High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes , 2016, Nature.

[19]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low‐Latency Satellite Data , 2018 .

[20]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[21]  H. Crutcher A Note on the Possible Misuse of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test , 1975 .

[22]  M. Hansen,et al.  Mapping and sampling to characterize global inland water dynamics from 1999 to 2018 with full Landsat time-series , 2020 .

[23]  Lukas Gudmundsson,et al.  The Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM) – Part 1: The production of a daily streamflow archive and metadata , 2017 .

[24]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[25]  J. Finlay,et al.  Flow-related dynamics in suspended algal biomass and its contribution to suspended particulate matter in an agricultural river network of the Minnesota River Basin, USA , 2016, Hydrobiologia.

[26]  Lukas Gudmundsson,et al.  The Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM) – Part 2: Quality Control, Time-series Indices and Homogeneity Assessment , 2017 .

[27]  John W. Jones,et al.  Improved Automated Detection of Subpixel-Scale Inundation - Revised Dynamic Surface Water Extent (DSWE) Partial Surface Water Tests , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[28]  E. Vermote,et al.  Performance of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance products for river remote sensing retrievals of chlorophyll-a and turbidity , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[29]  Janet K. Thompson,et al.  Why are diverse relationships observed between phytoplankton biomass and transport time? , 2009 .

[30]  Laurence C. Smith,et al.  Tracking Dynamic Northern Surface Water Changes with High-Frequency Planet CubeSat Imagery , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[31]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  MERIT Hydro: A High‐Resolution Global Hydrography Map Based on Latest Topography Dataset , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[32]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity , 2010, Nature.

[33]  P. Bates,et al.  Spatial and temporal complexity of the Amazon flood measured from space , 2007 .

[34]  Paul V. Zimba,et al.  Remote Sensing Techniques to Assess Water Quality , 2003 .

[35]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products , 2017 .

[36]  G. L. Schmidt,et al.  A multi‐scale segmentation approach to filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC‐off images , 2007 .

[37]  J. Dozier,et al.  Inroads of remote sensing into hydrologic science during the WRR era , 2015 .

[38]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  Estimation of river discharge, propagation speed, and hydraulic geometry from space: Lena River, Siberia , 2008 .

[39]  Michael Durand,et al.  Global Reconstruction of Naturalized River Flows at 2.94 Million Reaches , 2019, Water resources research.

[40]  S. Dufour,et al.  Remotely sensed rivers in the Anthropocene: state of the art and prospects , 2020, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[41]  H. Laudon,et al.  The river as a chemostat: fresh perspectives on dissolved organic matter flowing down the river continuum , 2015 .

[42]  N. Asselman Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves , 2000 .

[43]  Alison P. Appling,et al.  AquaSat: A Data Set to Enable Remote Sensing of Water Quality for Inland Waters , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[44]  B. Abbott,et al.  Elemental properties, hydrology, and biology interact to shape concentration‐discharge curves for carbon, nutrients, sediment, and major ions , 2017 .

[45]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Research Trends in the Use of Remote Sensing for Inland Water Quality Science: Moving Towards Multidisciplinary Applications , 2020 .

[46]  M. Ek,et al.  Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water , 2011 .

[47]  Michael Durand,et al.  Assessing the potential global extent of SWOT river discharge observations , 2014 .

[48]  Chris C. Park World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations , 1977 .

[49]  Xiao Yang,et al.  RivWidthCloud: An Automated Google Earth Engine Algorithm for River Width Extraction From Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2020, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[50]  M. Bauer,et al.  Factors affecting the measurement of CDOM by remote sensing of optically complex inland waters , 2015 .

[51]  Simon Plank,et al.  Sentinel-1-based flood mapping: a fully automated processing chain , 2016 .

[52]  P. Pekárová,et al.  Retrieval of suspended particulate matter concentrations in the Danube River from Landsat ETM data. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[53]  Andreas Kääb,et al.  River-ice and water velocities using the Planet optical cubesat constellation , 2019, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[54]  John B. Adams,et al.  Estimating suspended sediment concentrations in surface waters of the Amazon River wetlands from Landsat images , 1993 .

[55]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[56]  R. Peter Richards,et al.  A NEW FLASHINESS INDEX: CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATIONS TO MIDWESTERN RIVERS AND STREAMS 1 , 2004 .

[57]  Melanie K. Vanderhoof,et al.  Applying High-Resolution Imagery to Evaluate Restoration-Induced Changes in Stream Condition, Missouri River Headwaters Basin, Montana , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Colin J. Gleason,et al.  Remote Sensing of River Discharge: A Review and a Framing for the Discipline , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[59]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[60]  A. van Dijk,et al.  Hydromorphological attributes for all Australian river reaches derived from Landsat dynamic inundation remote sensing , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[61]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Using width‐based rating curves from spatially discontinuous satellite imagery to monitor river discharge , 2014 .

[62]  Colin J. Gleason,et al.  Comparing Discharge Estimates Made via the BAM Algorithm in High‐Order Arctic Rivers Derived Solely From Optical CubeSat, Landsat, and Sentinel‐2 Data , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[63]  C. M. Cooper,et al.  Using landsat multispectral scanner data to estimate suspended sediments in Moon Lake, Mississippi , 1987 .

[64]  M. Durand,et al.  How Does the Unique Space‐Time Sampling of the SWOT Mission Influence River Discharge Series Characteristics? , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[65]  Shiqiang Zhang,et al.  Detecting, Extracting, and Monitoring Surface Water From Space Using Optical Sensors: A Review , 2018, Reviews of Geophysics.

[66]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[67]  G. Fasano,et al.  A multidimensional version of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test , 1987 .

[68]  P. Sen Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau , 1968 .

[69]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  A quantile function approach to discharge estimation from satellite altimetry (ENVISAT) , 2013 .

[70]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.