Sharing Receptive Fields with Your Neighbors: Tuning the Vertical System Cells to Wide Field Motion

In the blowfly, the direction-selective response of the 60 lobula-plate tangential cells has been ascribed to the integration of local motion information across their extensive dendritic trees. Because the lobula plate is organized retinotopically, the receptive fields of the tangential cells ought to be determined by their dendritic architecture. However, this appears not always to be the case. One compelling example is the exceptionally wide receptive fields of the vertical system (VS) tangential cells. Using dual-intracellular recordings, Haag and Borst (2004) found VS cells to be mutually coupled in such a way that each VS cell is connected exclusively to its immediate neighbors. This coupling may form the basis of the broad receptive fields of VS cells. Here, we tested this hypothesis directly by photoablating individual VS cells. The receptive field width of VS cells indeed narrowed after the ablation of single VS cells, specifically depending on whether the receptive field of the ablated cell was more frontal or more posterior to the recorded cell. In particular, the responses changed as if the neuron lost access to visual information from the ablated neuron and those VS cells more distal than it from the recorded neuron. These experiments provide strong evidence that the lateral connections among VS cells are a crucial component in the mechanism underlying their complex receptive fields, augmenting the direct columnar input to their dendrites.

[1]  Béla Völgyi,et al.  Function and plasticity of homologous coupling between AII amacrine cells , 2004, Vision Research.

[2]  Y. Kurosawa,et al.  Dendrodendritic Electrical Synapses between Mammalian Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  A Borst,et al.  Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  A. Borst,et al.  Neural mechanism underlying complex receptive field properties of motion-sensitive interneurons , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Effects of Mean Firing on Neural Information Rate , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[6]  Alexander Borst,et al.  The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells: I. Passive membrane properties , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Hengstenberg Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[8]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  The number and structure of giant vertical cells (VS) in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  W. Ribi,et al.  Gap junctions coupling photoreceptor axons in the first optic ganglion of the fly , 1978, Cell and Tissue Research.

[10]  A. Borst,et al.  The Intrinsic Electrophysiological Characteristics of Fly Lobula Plate Tangential Cells: II. Active Membrane Properties , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[11]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Noise, Not Stimulus Entropy, Determines Neural Information Rate , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[12]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Impact of Photon Noise on the Reliability of a Motion-Sensitive Neuron in the Fly's Visual System , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Borst,et al.  Input Organization of Multifunctional Motion-Sensitive Neurons in the Blowfly , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Synaptic transfer of dynamic motion information between identified neurons in the visual system of the blowfly , 2003, Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Borst,et al.  Orientation tuning of motion-sensitive neurons shaped by vertical-horizontal network interactions , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  Peter Sterling,et al.  Electrical Coupling between Mammalian Cones , 2002, Current Biology.

[17]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendro-Dendritic Interactions between Motion-Sensitive Large-Field Neurons in the Fly , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Transfer of Visual Motion Information via Graded Synapses Operates Linearly in the Natural Activity Range , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Weiler,et al.  Expression of Neuronal Connexin36 in AII Amacrine Cells of the Mammalian Retina , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  G D Lewen,et al.  Neural coding of naturalistic motion stimuli , 2001, Network.

[21]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration and its role in computing image velocity. , 1998, Science.

[22]  R Hengstenberg,et al.  Dendritic structure and receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  S. Laughlin,et al.  The rate of information transfer at graded-potential synapses , 1996, Nature.

[24]  W. Bialek,et al.  RELIABILITY AND STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY OF A BLOWFLY MOVEMENT-SENSITIVE NEURON , 1995 .

[25]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  E. Strettoi,et al.  Synaptic connections of the narrow‐field, bistratified rod amacrine cell (AII) in the rabbit retina , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Peter Sterling,et al.  Gap junctions between the pedicles of macaque foveal cones , 1992, Vision Research.

[28]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration of motion information in visual interneurons of the blowfly , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  In vivo imaging of calcium accumulation in fly interneurons as elicited by visual motion stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. I. Vaney,et al.  Many diverse types of retinal neurons show tracer coupling when injected with biocytin or Neurobiotin , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  M Tessier-Lavigne,et al.  The effect of photoreceptor coupling and synapse nonlinearity on signal : noise ratio in early visual processing , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Synaptic limitations to contrast coding in the retina of the blowfly Calliphora , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[33]  W. G. Owen,et al.  Chemical and electrical synapses between photoreceptors in the retina of the turtle, Chelydra serpentina , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  H. Kolb,et al.  Electron microscopy of Golgi-impregnated photoreceptors reveals connections between red and green cones in the turtle retina. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J P Miller,et al.  Functional properties of individual neuronal branches isolated in situ by laser photoinactivation. , 1985, Science.

[36]  J. Miller,et al.  Rapid killing of single neurons by irradiation of intracellularly injected dye. , 1979, Science.

[37]  R. Hengstenberg Spike responses of ‘non-spiking’ visual interneurone , 1977, Nature.

[38]  T. Lamb,et al.  The relation between intercellular coupling and electrical noise in turtle photoreceptors. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  Helga Kolb,et al.  A bistratified amacrine cell and synaptic circuitry in the inner plexiform layer of the retina , 1975, Brain Research.

[40]  E. Raviola,et al.  Gap junctions between photoreceptor cells in the vertebrate retina. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.