Analysis of Public Oral Toxicity Data from REACH Registrations 2008–2014

Summary The European Chemicals Agency, ECHA, made available a total of 13,832 oral toxicity studies for 8,568 substances up to December 2014. 75% of studies were from the retired OECD Test Guideline 401 (11% TG 420, 11% TG 423 and 1.5% TG 425). Concordance across guidelines, evaluated by comparing LD50 values ≥ 2,000 or < 2,000 mg/ kg bodyweight from chemicals tested multiple times between different guidelines, was at least 75% and for their own repetition more than 90%. In 2009, Bulgheroni et al. created a simple model for predicting acute oral toxicity using no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) from 28-day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats. This was reproduced here for 1,625 substances. In 2014, Taylor et al. suggested no added value of the 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity test given the availability of a low 28-day study with some constraints. We confirm that the 28-day NOAEL is predictive (albeit imperfectly) of 90-day NOAELs, however, the suggested constraints did not affect predictivity. 1,059 substances with acute oral toxicity data (268 positives, 791 negatives, all Klimisch score 1) were used for modeling: The Chemical Development Kit was used to generate 27 molecular descriptors and a similarity-informed multilayer perceptron showing 71% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Additionally, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm indicated that similarity-based approaches alone may be poor predictors of acute oral toxicity, but can be used to inform the multilayer perceptron model, where this was the feature with the highest information value.

[1]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought...on alternative methods for chemical safety testing. , 2010, ALTEX.

[2]  Katy Taylor,et al.  The added value of the 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity test for industrial chemicals with a low (sub)acute toxicity profile in a high quality dataset. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  M. Jacomy,et al.  ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)). , 2009, ALTEX.

[5]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[6]  Wout Slob,et al.  A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: what is the added value of the second generation? , 2007, Reproductive toxicology.

[7]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[8]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[9]  HighWire Press,et al.  Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character , 1934 .

[10]  E Walum,et al.  Acute oral toxicity. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Chemical regulators have overreached , 2009, Nature.

[12]  J Jaworska,et al.  How can structural similarity analysis help in category formation? , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[13]  Daniel P. Russo,et al.  Global Analysis of Publicly Available Safety Data for 9,801 Substances Registered under REACH from 2008–2014 , 2016, ALTEX.

[14]  John William Trevan,et al.  The Error of Determination of Toxicity. , 1927 .

[15]  Walter Aulmann,et al.  REACH and CLP. Its Role in Regulatory Toxicology , 2014 .

[16]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[17]  Fernando C. Lourenço,et al.  Binary-based similarity measures for categorical data and their application in Self- Organizing Maps , 2004 .

[18]  Bing Wang,et al.  Concordance of Noncarcinogenic Endpoints in Rodent Chemical Bioassays , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  R N Hill,et al.  Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures. , 1995, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[20]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought ... on alternative methods for cosmetics safety testing. , 2008, ALTEX.

[21]  Rae Baxter,et al.  Acknowledgments.-The authors would like to , 1982 .

[22]  Yanli Wang,et al.  PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities , 2008 .

[23]  A. Piersma,et al.  Retrospective analysis of relative parameter sensitivity in multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies. , 2009, Reproductive toxicology.

[24]  D. Kibler,et al.  Instance-based learning algorithms , 2004, Machine Learning.

[25]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An Open-Source Java Library for Chemo-and Bioinformatics , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..